Chithambaram Chetti Vs. Natesan Chetti and anr.

Chithambaram Chetti vs Natesan Chetti and anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Sep 02, 1891

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/777816

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/777816
Court: Chennai
Decided On: Sep 02, 1891
Subject: Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Key legal issue: Property

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chithambaram Chetti

Respondent

Natesan Chetti and anr.

Legal References

Reported In: (1896)6MLJ616

Excerpt

- 1. section 40 of act ii of 1864 directs that the court shall cause the proper process to be issued for putting the purchaser in possession. the intention, which the language suggests, is s that the purchaser shall be placed in possession without being under the the necessity of instituting a suit for that purpose. it' the execution of '4 the process is obstructed, the provision of the code of civil procedure became applicable. to hold otherwise would be to defeat the intention of section 40 of the revenue recovery act, which gives a certificate the same force, which a decree of court has under the code of civil procedure.2. we set aside the order of the district munsiff and direct that the petition be restored to the file and disposed of in accordance with law. counter-petitioner will pay the costs of this petition.

Full Judgment

1. Section 40 of Act II of 1864 directs that the court shall cause the proper process to be issued for putting the purchaser in possession. The intention, which the language suggests, is S that the purchaser shall be placed in possession without being under the the necessity of instituting a suit for that purpose. It' the execution of '4 the process is obstructed, the provision of the Code of Civil Procedure became applicable. To hold otherwise would be to defeat the intention of Section 40 of the Revenue Recovery Act, which gives a certificate the same force, which a decree of court has under the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. We set aside the order of the District Munsiff and direct that the petition be restored to the file and disposed of in accordance with law. Counter-petitioner will pay the costs of this petition.

Same Parties Chithambaram Chetti vs Natesan Chetti and anr. Same Subject Property

Property