Skip to content


Maramittath Narayanan Nambudri Vs. Mayilkakhodath Narayanan Nambudri - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Civil

Court

Chennai

Decided On

Reported in

(1896)6MLJ499

Appellant

Maramittath Narayanan Nambudri

Respondent

Mayilkakhodath Narayanan Nambudri

Excerpt:


- orderparker, j.1. the transmission of the money order was not in itself a tender, and the post office peon was not the agent of the judgment-creditor. it is no doubt a hard case, but the order of the district munsif was right. the order of the district judge must be set aside and that of the district munsif restored. the appellant is entitled to his costs throughout.

Judgment:


ORDER

Parker, J.

1. The transmission of the money order was not in itself a tender, and the post office peon was not the agent of the judgment-creditor. It is no doubt a hard case, but the order of the District Munsif was right. The order of the District Judge must be set aside and that of the District Munsif restored. The appellant is entitled to his costs throughout.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //