Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

In Re: N.D., a Second Grade Pleader

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 01, 1928
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/774386

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai
Decided On
Subject
Civil

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

-

Key legal issue
Civil

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

In Re: N.D., a Second Grade Pleader

Legal References

Reported In
110Ind.Cas.815; (1928)55MLJ170

Excerpt

- murray coutts trotter, kt., c.j.1. the pleader in this case is fortunate in that the district judge has not actually found in terms that the story told by him is a deliberate concoction. he found that the story was extremely improbable but not demonstrated to be false. had he so found the pleader would have been struck off for life. but what is left is very serious. here is a professional man, whose business it is to appraise evidence, launching a grave charge against a public judicial officer on materials which he must have known to be wholly inadequate to sustain it. at the last moment under pressure from this court he brought forward in corroboration an alleged eye-witness of the bribe taking, whose evidence is transparently false. we wish to make it clear to the profession, if it does not already realise it, that it is misconduct for a professional man not only to make charges which he knows to be false but charges which he must know he has no reasonable prospect of substantiating. this pleader's sannad must be withheld till the end of 1929.

Full Judgment

Murray Coutts Trotter, Kt., C.J.

1. The pleader in this case is fortunate in that the District Judge has not actually found in terms that the story told by him is a deliberate concoction. He found that the story was extremely improbable but not demonstrated to be false. Had he so found the pleader would have been struck off for life. But what is left is very serious. Here is a professional man, whose business it is to appraise evidence, launching a grave charge against a public judicial officer on materials which he must have known to be wholly inadequate to sustain it. At the last moment under pressure from this Court he brought forward in corroboration an alleged eye-witness of the bribe taking, whose evidence is transparently false. We wish to make it clear to the profession, if it does not already realise it, that it is misconduct for a professional man not only to make charges which he knows to be false but charges which he must know he has no reasonable prospect of substantiating. This pleader's sannad must be withheld till the end of 1929.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial