Skip to content


The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Smt. Gyan Devi and ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
SubjectMotor vehicle
CourtRajasthan High Court
Decided On
Case NumberD.B. Special Appeal No. 41 of 2000
Judge
Reported in2002(2)WLN554
AppellantThe Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
RespondentSmt. Gyan Devi and ors.
Cases ReferredNew India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Kamla and Ors.
Excerpt:
motor vehicles act, 1988 - section 173--motor accidents claim--'third party risk'--instant liability of insurer--award of rs. 7,89,600/- passed by mact with 12% interest against appellant and owner of vehicle--owner has not preferred appeal--d.b. admitted appeal and stayed recovery against insurer--appellants contention that there was breach of the policy conditions--held, even if there was breach of policy conditions then also insurance company is liable to deposit the entire award before tribunal--tribunal which shall pay rs. 2 lacs to widow of deceased and rs. 50,000/- to mother of deceased and remaining amount be deposited with bank for 2 years, in the name of tribunal, to be renewed timely, till disposal of appeal.;stay petition disposed of - - the award has been passed against the..........vehicle in question, the husband of the first respondent, smt. gyan devi died in the accident. the motor accident claims tribunal awarded a sum of rs. 7,89,600/- as compensation together with the interest @ 12% from the date of filing of the petition till the date of payment. the award has been passed against the appellant-insurance company as well as the owner of the vehicle-respondent no. 9 herein. the owner has not preferred any appeal against the award of the motor accident claims tribunal and the appellant-insurance company alone has preferred the appeal.3. while admitting the present appeal, a division bench of this court granted stay on the recovery of the compensation amount from the insurance company, but reserved liberty to the claimants to recover the compensation from the.....
Judgment:

AR. Lakshmanan, C.J.

1. Heard Mr. Tripurari Sharma, for the appellant, Mr. Sandeep Mathur, for respondents No. 1 to 8 and Shri K.N. Tiwari, for respondents No. 9 and 10.

2. In this case, due to rash and negligent driving of the vehicle in question, the husband of the first respondent, Smt. Gyan Devi died in the accident. The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs. 7,89,600/- as compensation together with the interest @ 12% from the date of filing of the petition till the date of payment. The award has been passed against the appellant-Insurance Company as well as the owner of the vehicle-respondent No. 9 herein. The owner has not preferred any appeal against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal and the appellant-Insurance Company alone has preferred the appeal.

3. While admitting the present appeal, a Division Bench of this Court granted stay on the recovery of the compensation amount from the Insurance Company, but reserved liberty to the claimants to recover the compensation from the owner of the vehicle.

4. The Supreme Court in an identical case, while considering the 'third party risk', was of the opinion that the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation to the third party irrespective of the fact that there has been any breach or violation of the policy conditions and that the Insurance Company can recover from the insured the amount so paid to the third party if as per the policy conditions the insurer had no liability to pay such sum. This judgment is reported in : [2001]2SCR797 , New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Kamla and Ors., decided on 27.3.2001.

5. In the instant case, Mr. Suresh Kumar Agarwal husband of the first respondent-herein, was the occupant of the jeep, who died in the tragic accident. In the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court, referred above, the appellant Insurance Company cannot take shelter on the plea that there has been breach or violation of the policy conditions. We, therefore, reject the said contention and direct the appellant Insurance Company to immediately deposit the entire sum of compensation i.e. Rs. 7,89,600/- with interest and cost as awarded by the Tribunal, with the concerned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Baran (Raj.), within four weeks from today and the said Tribunal, on deposit of such amount by the appellant-Insurance Company, shall order payment of Rs. 2,00,000/- to the first respondent herein-Smt. Gyan Devi (widow of deceased Shri Suresh Kumar Agarwal) and Rs. 50,000/- to the respondent No. 5 Smt. Sushila, widow of Chhitarlal and mother of the deceased, out of the total compensation amount to be deposited by the appellant-Insurance Company and shall reinvest the entire balance amount of compensation in any of the Nationalished Banks to the credit of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, in respect of Claim Application No. 116/98, initially for a period of two years. The deposit shall be renewed from time to time, till the disposal of the present appeal.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //