Smt. Hakri and ors. Vs. State of ors.

Smt. Hakri and ors. vs State of ors.

Disposition Petition dismissed Court Rajasthan Decided Jan 18, 2001

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/769525

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/769525
Court: Rajasthan High Court
Judge: Bhagwati Prasad, J.
Decided On: Jan 18, 2001
Case Number: Civil Writ Petn. No. 556 of 2000
Subject: Election
Disposition: Petition dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Panchayat Act, 1996 - Election--Election of ward Panch challenged by this writ petition--Document filed by petitioner not prepared correctly--Material difference in two computation sheets Annex R-1 & Annex-1--No interference in writ jurisdiction is justified--Petitioner is at liberty to file election petition.;W...

Key legal issue: Election
Outcome / disposition: Petition dismissed
Acts & sections: Constitution of India - Article 226; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 87

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smt. Hakri and ors.

Advocate K.N. Joshi and; Dinesh Maheshwari, Advs.

Respondent

State of ors.

Advocate N.K. Rastogi and; M.R. Patel, Advs.

Legal References

Acts: Constitution of India - Article 226; Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 87
Reported In: AIR2002Raj4; 2001WLC(Raj)UC301; 2001(1)WLN719

Excerpt

panchayat act, 1996 - election--election of ward panch challenged by this writ petition--document filed by petitioner not prepared correctly--material difference in two computation sheets annex r-1 & annex-1--no interference in writ jurisdiction is justified--petitioner is at liberty to file election petition.;writ petition dismissed - orderbhagwati prasad, j.1. learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance on computationsheet annex. 1. the respondents have filedannex. r/1 and contested that there areobvious errors in the computation sheetannex. 1. in ward no. 8, there were threecandidates. only two candidates have beenshown in annex. 1. if three candidates areentered, then position becomes clear as evident from annex. r/1. comparing two documents, defect pointed out by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner is obvious. further a look at annex. 1 shows that it hasbeen incorrectly prepared. not only the votesof the petitioner have been wrongly mentioned but age of the petitioner hakri hasbeen shown to be 466 years. obviously onthe basis of such document, no interferencecan be done in the writ jurisdiction of thiscourt. if any case or grievance remains withthe petitioners, they will be at liberty to filean election petition before the election tribunal.

Full Judgment

ORDER

Bhagwati Prasad, J.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance on computationsheet Annex. 1. The respondents have filedAnnex. R/1 and contested that there areobvious errors in the computation sheetAnnex. 1. In ward No. 8, there were threecandidates. Only two candidates have beenshown in Annex. 1. If three candidates areentered, then position becomes clear as evident from Annex. R/1. Comparing two documents, defect pointed out by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner is obvious. Further a look at Annex. 1 shows that it hasbeen incorrectly prepared. Not only the votesof the petitioner have been wrongly mentioned but age of the petitioner Hakri hasbeen shown to be 466 years. Obviously onthe basis of such document, no interferencecan be done in the writ jurisdiction of thisCourt. If any case or grievance remains withthe petitioners, they will be at liberty to filean election petition before the Election Tribunal.

Same Court & Year Rajasthan · 2001 Same Parties Smt. Hakri and ors. vs State of ors. Same Subject Election Same Judge Bhagwati Prasad, J. Acts & Sections Constitution of India - Article 226; Representation of the Pe...

Election