Skip to content


Santosh Bai Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Service

Court

Rajasthan High Court

Decided On

Judge

Reported in

RLW2008(1)Raj613

Appellant

Santosh Bai

Respondent

State of Rajasthan and ors.

Disposition

Petition allowed

Excerpt:


- .....since no action was taken, there was no option for the petitioner but to seek protection of this court in the present writ petition.2. in reply, the facts as stated above have not been disputed so far. however, only technical objection as taken by the respondents is that the application was not submitted within 45 days as prescribed under the rules of 1996. in a welfare state when a benefit is given to mitigate hardship of the family of deceased employee, the authorities are not supposed to be so insensitive to take such hyper technical objection. a widow illiterate lady with two minor children suddenly faced with the death of his husband is not expected to react immediately and complete all the formalities as per relevant rules. even otherwise, the application has been filed within 12 months of the death of her husband. such delay cannot be treated as inordinate delay.2.1 accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. respondents are directed to give compassionate appointment to the petitioner on the post of class-iv within 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. since unjustified and unreasonable stand has been taken by the respondents in the present case.....

Judgment:


Ashok Parihar, J.

1. Husband of the petitioner died while in service on 31.3.1995. Petitioner being widow with two minor children applied for compassionate appointment on 12.3.1996. The application in due proforma had also been submitted accordingly. On receipt of application, the same was also forwarded by the concerned authorities to the State Government for giving relaxation of period for filing the application. However, since no action was taken, there was no option for the petitioner but to seek protection of this Court in the present writ petition.

2. In reply, the facts as stated above have not been disputed so far. However, only technical objection as taken by the respondents is that the application was not submitted within 45 days as prescribed under the Rules of 1996. In a welfare State when a benefit is given to mitigate hardship of the family of deceased employee, the authorities are not supposed to be so insensitive to take such hyper technical objection. A widow illiterate lady with two minor children suddenly faced with the death of his husband is not expected to react immediately and complete all the formalities as per relevant rules. Even otherwise, the application has been filed within 12 months of the death of her husband. Such delay cannot be treated as inordinate delay.

2.1 Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed. Respondents are directed to give compassionate appointment to the petitioner on the post of Class-IV within 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Since unjustified and unreasonable stand has been taken by the respondents in the present case and the petitioner has been denied livelihood for more than a decade, the respondents shall further pay a cost of Rs. 10,000/- to the petitioner within the above period.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //