Babura Vs. State of Rajasthan

Babura vs State of Rajasthan

Disposition Appeal dismissed Court Rajasthan Decided Oct 17, 1986

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/766796

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/766796
Court: Rajasthan High Court
Judge: Milap Chand Jain, J.
Decided On: Oct 17, 1986
Case Number: S.B. Criminal (Jail) Appeal No. 29 of 1985
Subject: Criminal
Disposition: Appeal dismissed

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code - Section 392 read with 397--Two grievous injuries out of 11 injuries--Ornaments removed from nose & ears--Held, view of sessions court is proper.;Appeal Dismissed -

Key legal issue: Criminal
Outcome / disposition: Appeal dismissed

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Babura

Respondent

State of Rajasthan

Legal References

Reported In: 1987WLN(UC)159

Excerpt

penal code - section 392 read with 397--two grievous injuries out of 11 injuries--ornaments removed from nose & ears--held, view of sessions court is proper.;appeal dismissed - milap chand jain, j.1. i have heard learned counsel for the appellant and the learned public prosecutor for the state and perused the record of the case.2. the offence under section 392 read with section 397, ipc is amply proved against the appellant. the appellant robed mst. jetu of her ornaments, after inflicting as many as 11 injuries, out of which two were grievous hurts. he removed the ornaments, from the ears and nose. the case was registered against the accused, after medical examination of mst. jetu. the accused was arrested and the ornaments of mst. jetu were recovered on the information and at the instance of the accused-appellant. the learned sessions judge has dealt with the evidence thoroughly and i agree with the view taken by the learned sessions judge. in my opinion, this appeal has no force, so, it is hereby dismissed.

Full Judgment

Milap Chand Jain, J.

1. I have heard learned Counsel for the appellant and the learned Public Prosecutor for the State and perused the record of the case.

2. The offence under Section 392 read with Section 397, IPC is amply proved against the appellant. The appellant robed Mst. Jetu of her ornaments, after inflicting as many as 11 injuries, out of which two were grievous hurts. He removed the ornaments, from the ears and nose. The case was registered against the accused, after medical examination of Mst. Jetu. The accused was arrested and the ornaments of Mst. Jetu were recovered on the information and at the instance of the accused-appellant. The learned Sessions Judge has dealt with the evidence thoroughly and I agree with the view taken by the learned Sessions Judge. In my opinion, this appeal has no force, so, it is hereby dismissed.

Same Court & Year Rajasthan · 1986 Same Parties Babura vs State of Rajasthan Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Milap Chand Jain, J.

Criminal