Skip to content


Modi Fulchand Narsida Vs. Navnitlal Ranchhoddas and ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Civil

Court

Gujarat High Court

Decided On

Case Number

Civil Revn. Appln. No. 121 of 1960

Judge

Reported in

AIR1962Guj295

Acts

Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920 - Sections 9(1)

Appellant

Modi Fulchand Narsida

Respondent

Navnitlal Ranchhoddas and ors.

Appellant Advocate

M.R. Barot, Adv.

Respondent Advocate

J.C. Sheth, Adv.

Disposition

Application dismissed

Excerpt:


- orderv.b. raju, j.1. this civil revision application is dismissed, because the finding of the court below that an application to adjudicate the opponents as insolvents does not lie because the claim for damages for breach of contracts relating to forward business was not a debt within the meaning of section 9(1)(b) of the provincial insolvency act is correct, it is correct because a claim for damages does not amount to a debt unless the damages are ascertained by la court. there is, therefore, no question of illegality or material irregularity in the exercise of jurisdiction.2. the application is therefore, dismissed with costs.

Judgment:


ORDER

V.B. Raju, J.

1. This civil revision application is dismissed, because the finding of the Court below that an application to adjudicate the Opponents as insolvents does not lie because the claim for damages for breach of contracts relating to forward business was not a debt within the meaning of Section 9(1)(b) of the Provincial Insolvency Act is correct, it is correct because a claim for damages does not amount to a debt unless the damages are ascertained by la Court. There is, therefore, no question of illegality or material irregularity in the exercise of jurisdiction.

2. The application is therefore, dismissed with costs.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //