Skip to content


K.T. Thomas Vs. Agricultural Income-tax Officer and ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
SubjectDirect Taxation
CourtKerala High Court
Decided On
Case NumberW.A. No. 1009 of 1988
Judge
Reported in[1990]184ITR561(Ker)
ActsIncome Tax Act, 1950 - Sections 16(4); Constitution of India, Articles - 246 and 366; ;Income Tax Rules, 1962 - Rule 8; Kerala Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1950 - Sections 18(4)
AppellantK.T. Thomas
RespondentAgricultural Income-tax Officer and ors.
Appellant Advocate T.R.G. Warriyar, Adv.
Respondent AdvocateAdvocate General
Excerpt:
direct taxation - assessment - rule 8 of income tax rules ,1962 and section 18 (4) of kerala agricultural income tax act, 1950 - assessment challenged on ground of failure to give opportunity of hearing - evidence prove that assessment order made prior to time given for submitting reply to pre-assessment notice - such order untenable. head note: income tax agricultural income tax assessment--best - - the estimation of agricultural income from tea as equal to the taxable turnover on the sale of tea for the relevant assessment year is clearly wrong and hte orders of assessment are vitiated by these errors apparent on the face of the record......is not of the income during the previous year, but the taxable turnover on sal of tea during the relevant assessment year itself. the assessment accordingly is not in conformity with s. 3. the admissible deductions under the act for expenses of cultivation, maintenance etc. are not allowed in accepting the taxable turnover as the agricultural income from tea for the relevant assessment year. the estimation of agricultural income from tea as equal to the taxable turnover on the sale of tea for the relevant assessment year is clearly wrong and hte orders of assessment are vitiated by these errors apparent on the face of the record. agricultural income taxassessment--jurisdiction of agrl. ito--levying tax on that portion of income from sale of tea which, as per r. 8 of it rules, is to be.....
Judgment:

ASSESSMENT--Not to be capricious or vindictive

Held:

As per the charging provision under s. 3 of the Agricultural IT Act, tax is charged for each financial year on the total agricultural income of the previous year of the assessee. In the present case, the estimate of agricultural income from tea for the purpose of assessment is not of the income during the previous year, but the taxable turnover on sal of tea during the relevant assessment year itself. The assessment accordingly is not in conformity with s. 3. The admissible deductions under the Act for expenses of cultivation, maintenance etc. are not allowed in accepting the taxable turnover as the agricultural income from tea for the relevant assessment year. The estimation of agricultural income from tea as equal to the taxable turnover on the sale of tea for the relevant assessment year is clearly wrong and hte orders of assessment are vitiated by these errors apparent on the face of the record.

AGRICULTURAL INCOME TAX

Assessment--JURISDICTION OF AGRL. ITO--Levying tax on that portion of income from sale of tea which, as per r. 8 of IT Rules, is to be treated as income under IT Act

Held:

Levy of tax by the State under the Agrl. IT Act can relate only to sixty per cent of the income derived from the slae of tea after allowing also admissible deductions under s. of the Agrl. IT Act. In the present case, the taxable turonver on the sale of tea for the respective assessment years is taken as the agricultural income from tea and the entire income is seen assessed in total idsregard of the constitutional provisions. The Agrl. ITO has no jurisdiction to levy tax on that portion of income from the sale of tea which as per r. 8 of the IT Rules is to be treated as income for the purpose of levy of tax under the IT Act, 1961.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //