Skip to content


Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Orissa Cement Ltd. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Direct Taxation

Court

Delhi High Court

Decided On

Case Number

Income-tax Reference No. 252 of 1985

Judge

Reported in

[2001]251ITR119(Delhi); [2001]119TAXMAN742(Delhi)

Acts

Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 140A(1), 214 and 256(1)

Appellant

Commissioner of Income-tax

Respondent

Orissa Cement Ltd.

Appellant Advocate

R.C. Pandey and; Prem Lata Bansal, Advs

Respondent Advocate

None

Cases Referred

National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. v. Union of India

Excerpt:


- .....'the act'), the following question has been referred by the income-tax appellate tribunal, delhi bench 'd' (in short 'the tribunal'), for the opinion of this court : 'whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the appellate tribunal was justified in law in holding that the assessed was entitled to interest on the entire refund amount of rs. 19,71,005 which also included part payment made by the assessed under section 140a(1) ?' 2. the dispute relates to the assessment year 1976-77. we find that the tribunal relied on the decision of this court in national agricultural cooperative marketing federation of india ltd. v. union of india : [1981]130itr928(delhi) to grant relief to the assessed in terms of section 214 of the act. the issue involved appears to have been considered by the apex court in modi industries ltd. v. cit : [1995]216itr759(sc) . 3. in our considered view it would be appropriate if the tribunal hears the appeal afresh and decides the matter keeping in view the guidelines and the position as summarised in modi industries' case : [1995]216itr759(sc) . ordered accordingly. 4. the reference stands disposed of.

Judgment:


Arijit Pasayat, C.J.

1. Accepting the prayer made in terms of Section 256(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), the following question has been referred by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'D' (in short 'the Tribunal'), for the opinion of this court :

'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the assessed was entitled to interest on the entire refund amount of Rs. 19,71,005 which also included part payment made by the assessed under Section 140A(1) ?'

2. The dispute relates to the assessment year 1976-77. We find that the Tribunal relied on the decision of this court in National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India Ltd. v. Union of India : [1981]130ITR928(Delhi) to grant relief to the assessed in terms of Section 214 of the Act. The issue involved appears to have been considered by the apex court in Modi Industries Ltd. v. CIT : [1995]216ITR759(SC) .

3. In our considered view it would be appropriate if the Tribunal hears the appeal afresh and decides the matter keeping in view the guidelines and the position as summarised in Modi Industries' case : [1995]216ITR759(SC) . Ordered accordingly.

4. The reference stands disposed of.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //