Skip to content


Microsoft Corporation and anr. Vs. Mitesh JaIn and anr. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Intellectual Property Rights

Court

Delhi High Court

Decided On

Case Number

CS (OS) 2530/2007

Judge

Reported in

LC2008(2)302

Acts

Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 151 - Order 23, Rule 3

Appellant

Microsoft Corporation and anr.

Respondent

Mitesh JaIn and anr.

Appellant Advocate

Munish Mehra, Adv

Respondent Advocate

Neeraj Grover, Adv.

Excerpt:


civil - recording of compromise/settlement - application for - order 23, rule 3 read with section 151 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 - plaintiff instituted suit against defendants alleging infringement of their copyright in the software programme developed by the plaintiffs and in particular 'microsoft windows xp professional version 2002' and 'microsoft office 2002' - however, during the pendency of suit parties reached settlement or compromise in respect of said disputes - hence, present application record the settlement reached - held, defendants have undertaken that they will not, in future, sell, offer for sale, distribute, issue to the public, any counterfeit/pirated/unlicenced versions of the plaintiffs' software or do any other act which would in any other manner amount to infringement of the plaintiffs' intellectual property rights - contents of the compromise/ settlement, arrived at between the parties found to be lawful - accordingly, compromise taken on record - application disposed of - - 3. i have examined the terms of settlement arrived at between the parties and am satisfied that the same are lawful.badar durrez ahmed, j.ia no. 3337/2008 (under order 23 rule 3 read with section 151 of cpc)1. the plaintiffs had filed this suit against the defendants alleging infringement of their copyright in the software programme developed by the plaintiffs and in particular 'microsoft windows xp professional version 2002' and 'microsoft office 2002'. during the pendency of the suit, the plaintiffs and the defendants have arrived at an amicable settlement. the defendants have acknowledged the plaintiffs to be the proprietors and owners of the copyrights in the aforesaid software programmes and have apologised for the infringement on their part. the defendants have undertaken that they will not, in future, sell, offer for sale, distribute, issue to the public, any counterfeit/pirated/unlicensed versions of the plaintiffs' software or do any other act which would in any other manner amount to infringement of the plaintiffs' intellectual property rights. the defendants have also undertaken to pay to the plaintiffs the us dollar equivalent of a sum of rs 1 lakh within a month by way of a draft in favor of microsoft corporation, usa to cover the partial legal costs incurred by the plaintiffs in.....

Judgment:


Badar Durrez Ahmed, J.

IA No. 3337/2008 (Under Order 23 Rule 3 Read with Section 151 of CPC)

1. The plaintiffs had filed this suit against the defendants alleging infringement of their copyright in the software programme developed by the plaintiffs and in particular 'Microsoft Windows XP Professional Version 2002' and 'Microsoft Office 2002'. During the pendency of the suit, the plaintiffs and the defendants have arrived at an amicable settlement. The defendants have acknowledged the plaintiffs to be the proprietors and owners of the copyrights in the aforesaid software programmes and have apologised for the infringement on their part. The defendants have undertaken that they will not, in future, sell, offer for sale, distribute, issue to the public, any counterfeit/pirated/unlicensed versions of the plaintiffs' software or do any other act which would in any other manner amount to infringement of the plaintiffs' intellectual property rights. The defendants have also undertaken to pay to the plaintiffs the US dollar equivalent of a sum of Rs 1 lakh within a month by way of a draft in favor of Microsoft Corporation, USA to cover the partial legal costs incurred by the plaintiffs in this suit. The rest of the terms and conditions which have been agreed upon by the parties are set out in this application itself. This application has been signed by Mr Anand Banerjee on behalf of the plaintiffs as their Constituted Attorney. It has also been signed by Mr Mitesh Jain who is the defendant No. 1 as also on behalf of the defendant No. 2 being the sole proprietor thereof. The affidavits of the said persons are also filed Along with this application. The respective counsel for the parties have also affixed their signatures on this application. This application has been marked as Exhibit C-1.

2. In consideration of the undertakings given by the defendants, the plaintiffs have agreed to forgo the prayers contained in paragraph 36 (b), (c), (d) and (e) of the plaint. The parties have agreed that a decree be passed in favor of the plaintiffs in terms of prayer 36 (a) of the plaint after incorporating the terms of settlement indicated in this application.

3. I have examined the terms of settlement arrived at between the parties and am satisfied that the same are lawful. The compromise / settlement is taken on record. The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendants in terms of the prayer contained in paragraph 36 (a) of the plaint as also in terms of the compromise set out in this application. The prayers contained in paragraph 36 (b), (c), (d) and (e) of the plaint have been given up by the plaintiffs. The formal decree be drawn up. Exhibit C-1 shall form part of the decree. The parties are granted leave to approach the Reserve Bank of India for process of their foreign remittance application in accordance with law.

This application, the suit and all pending applications stand disposed of.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //