Skip to content


State of Gujarat Vs. Gopalbhai Becharbhai - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
SubjectCivil
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided On
Case NumberCivil Appeal Nos. 1964 of 1989 Etc. Etc.
Judge
Reported in1996VIAD(SC)651; (1997)2GLR1498; 1996(6)SCALE270; (1996)6SCC125; [1996]Supp5SCR30
ActsLand Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 12(2), 18(2) and 31
AppellantState of Gujarat
RespondentGopalbhai Becharbhai
Advocates: N. Mukherjee and; H. Wahi, Advs
Prior historyAppeal From the Judgment and Order dated 9-3-1988 of the Gujarat High Court in S.C.A. No. 5825 of 1986
Excerpt:
.....be held to be holding the office of profit for contesting election of sarpanch of gram panchayat. - since the application came to be filed a long, after about three years from the date of the award, the direction issued by the high court is clearly illegal......in view of the provisions in section 18(2) read with section 31 of the act, after the notice was received under section 12(2) the claimants are required to file an application under section 18 seeking reference within a period of 30 days from the date of the award when the claimants were present at the time of making the award either in person or through counsel or within six months from the date of the receipt of the notice. in view of the fact that notice was issued on september 18, 1981, the application should have been filed within six weeks from the date of the collector's award when the person was present or was represented by the counsel before the collector or six weeks from the date of the receipt of the notice under sub-section (2) of section 12 or within six months from the.....
Judgment:
ORDER

1. These appeals by special leave arise from the judgment dated March 9, 1988 of the High Court of Gujarat in SCA No. 5825/86 and batch directing the appellant to make a reference to the civil Court. The controversy is no longer res integra.

2. The admitted facts are that the award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was passed on June 26, 1981. Notice under Section 12(2) was issued on September 18, 1.981. After lapse of three years, an application came to be filed on July 30, 1985 seeking reference under Section 18. The Land Acquisition Officer (Deputy Collector) rejected the application on December 16, 1985. Challenging that order, the writ petition came to be filed. In view of the provisions in Section 18(2) read with Section 31 of the Act, after the notice was received under Section 12(2) the claimants are required to file an application under Section 18 seeking reference within a period of 30 days from the date of the award when the claimants were present at the time of making the award either in person or through counsel or within six months from the date of the receipt of the notice. In view of the fact that notice was issued on September 18, 1981, the application should have been filed within six weeks from the date of the Collector's award when the person was present or was represented by the counsel before the Collector or six weeks from the date of the receipt of the notice under Sub-section (2) of Section 12 or within six months from the date of the Collector's award, whichever period shall first expire. Since the application came to be filed a long, after about three years from the date of the award, the direction issued by the High Court is clearly illegal.

3. The appeals are accordingly allowed. No costs.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //