Narayani Devi Vs. Mahendra Kr. Tripathi and ors. - Court Judgment |
| SooperKanoon Citation | sooperkanoon.com/669888 |
| Subject | Civil |
| Court | Supreme Court of India |
| Decided On | Dec-19-1997 |
| Case Number | SLP (C) Nos. 4968 and 8481 of 1997 |
| Judge | M.M. Punchhi and; S. Rajendra Babu, JJ. |
| Reported in | AIR1998SC2956; JT1998(9)SC204; (1999)9SCC61 |
| Acts | Uttar Pradesh Urban Buildings - (Regulation of Letting Rent and Eviction) Act, 1972 - Sections 18 |
| Appellant | Narayani Devi |
| Respondent | Mahendra Kr. Tripathi and ors. |
| Appellant Advocate | A.K. Srivastava, Sr. Adv.,; A.N. Sinha and; S.K. Misra, Adv |
| Respondent Advocate | Naresh Kr. Sharma, Adv. |
Excerpt:
uttar pradesh urban buildings - (regulation of letting rent and eviction) act, 1972 - section 18 - .....in a writ petition in the event of the final order of allotment or release going against him. as suggested, it is so clarified. with these observations, slp (c) no. 4968/97 preferred by smt. narayani devi would stand disposed of.slp (c) no. 8481/97: 2. this cross-petition is dismissed on.....
Judgment:ORDER
SLP (C) No. 4968/97:
1. In the impugned order dated 3-1-1997, the High Court has observed that M.K. Tripathi, the 1st respondent herein, would be permitted to contest the proceedings for allotment or release, as the case may be, and after a final order of allotment or release has been passed, he would be entitled to file a revision under Section 18 of U.P. Act No. 13 of 1972. It is the admitted position that a revision in that eventuality would not lie. It has been urged that the said direction be read as if the High Court was permitting the said respondent to move in a writ petition in the event of the final order of allotment or release going against him. As suggested, it is so clarified. With these observations, SLP (C) No. 4968/97 preferred by Smt. Narayani Devi would stand disposed of.
SLP (C) No. 8481/97:
2. This cross-petition is dismissed on merit.