Gulshan Sachdeva and anr. Vs. Sundial Communications Pvt. Ltd. and ors. - Court Judgment |
| Civil |
| Supreme Court of India |
| Nov-14-2003 |
| Special Leave Petition (C) Nos. 5608-5609 and 5611-5612 of 2003 |
| S. Rajendra Babu and; G.P. Mathur, JJ. |
| JT2003(8)SC613; (2004)1SCC116 |
| Gulshan Sachdeva and anr. |
| Sundial Communications Pvt. Ltd. and ors. |
| P. Chidambaram, Sr. Adv.,; A. Mariarputham,; Aruna Mathur, |
| C.A. Sundram, Sr. Adv. and ; Alamjit S. Nand, Adv. |
| Petition dismissed |
| From the Judgment and Order dated 27.3.2003 and 25.3.2003 of the Bombay High Court in Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction Appeal (Lodging) Nos. 233 and 236 of 2003 in Notice of Motion No. 783 of 2003 in Suit No. 767 of 2003
|
.....as diesel mechanic grade i. these postings were on mechanical side and ex-cadre postings. he had been holding the said post for a period of more than 12 years. a policy decision was taken by the railway administration only on or about 15.10.2001. prior thereto, there was no requirement to repatriate an employee to his parent cadre after a period of four years. the policy decision, furthermore, was not given immediate effect. despite the said policy decision, the appellant was permitted to work for another two years. a reversion order was passed thereafter. supreme court considering the circumstances of case while upholding the validity of the order of reversion granted benefit of pay protection to the appellant by exercising its power to do complete justice under article 142 of constitution. orderrajendra babu, j. 1. these matters arise out of an interim order passed by a learned single judge of the high court and the division bench, on appeal, having dismissed the appeals. 2. elaborate arguments have been addressed by the learned counsel on either side. it is unnecessary to examine the various questions raised in these petitions as these cases arise out of an interlocutory order. the high court has adequately taken care for quick disposal of the original matter. therefore, we decline to interfere with the order made by the high court. 3. these petitions, therefore, stand dismissed. no costs.
ORDER
Rajendra Babu, J.
1. These matters arise out of an interim order passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court and the Division Bench, on appeal, having dismissed the appeals.
2. Elaborate arguments have been addressed by the learned counsel on either side. It is unnecessary to examine the various questions raised in these petitions as these cases arise out of an interlocutory order. The High Court has adequately taken care for quick disposal of the original matter. Therefore, we decline to interfere with the order made by the High Court.
3. These petitions, therefore, stand dismissed. No costs.