Consumer Education Research Society Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. - Court Judgment

Excerpt:
.....application - no order passed in absence of main petition being heard - directions given for final hearing at an early date along with interlocutory application - order 1, rule 10 & section 96: [arijit pasayat , lokeshwar singh panta & p. sathasivam, jj] first appeal - suit for partition and separate possession - high court allowing impleading of purchasers pendente lite as party respondents in appeal? - when the purchasers approached the high court for their impleadment and for directions, final decree proceeding was pending before the trial court -- in fact, it was pointed out that pursuant to the application filed for passing final decree, a commissioner was appointed for division of the suit properties by metes and bounds -- respondent nos. 8 and 9 purchased item no.9 from.....order1. it will be appropriate to make any orders in these interlocutory applications at this stage unless the main petition is heard. it is only thereafter the prayers made in these interlocutory applications can be considered.2. list for final hearing at an early date along with these interlocutory applications.

Judgment:
ORDER

1. It will be appropriate to make any orders in these interlocutory applications at this stage unless the main petition is heard. It is only thereafter the prayers made in these interlocutory applications can be considered.

2. List for final hearing at an early date along with these interlocutory applications.