Skip to content


Mehsana Dist. Co-op. Milk P.U. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
SubjectExcise
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided On
Judge
Reported in2003(154)ELT347(SC)
AppellantMehsana Dist. Co-op. Milk P.U. Ltd.
RespondentUnion of India (Uoi)
DispositionAppeal allowed
Excerpt:
.....hardship and other such relevant factors. 3. we accordingly set aside the decision of the high court as well as the impugned order dated 14-8-2002 and remand the matter back to the appellate authority for re-determining the issue under section 35f of the act after affording an opportunity of hearing to the..........to the parties.4. the appeal is allowed without any order as to costs......
Judgment:
ORDER

1. Leave granted.

2. The issue here relates to the order passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Central Excise and Customs, under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. By the impugned order, the appellants have been directed todeposit an amount of Rs. 30 lakhs by way of pre-deposit. The reasoning given in support of such order is wholly unsatisfactory. The appellate authority has not at all considered the prima facie merits and has concentrated upon the prima facie balance of convenience in the case. The Appellate Authority should have addressed its mind to the prima facie merits of the appellants' case and upon being satisfied of the same determined the quantum of deposit taking into consideration the financial hardship and other such relevant factors.

3. We accordingly set aside the decision of the High Court as well as the impugned order dated 14-8-2002 and remand the matter back to the appellate authority for re-determining the issue under Section 35F of the Act after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties.

4. The appeal is allowed without any order as to costs.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //