Skip to content


inderjit Kaur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
SubjectCriminal
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided On
Case NumberWrit Petition No. 538 of 1988
Judge
Reported in(1990)1SCC344
ActsConstitution Of India - Article 32; Code Of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C), 1973 - Section 125
Appellantinderjit Kaur
RespondentUnion of India (Uoi) and ors.
DispositionPetition Dismissed
Excerpt:
- [k. jagannatha shetty shetty and; k.n. saikia, jj.] -- criminal procedure code, 1973 — section 125 — constitutionality of — challenged on ground of unreasonably limiting the maintenance to rs 500 -- section 125 provides a speedy remedy against starvation of the civil liabilities of parties. writ petition is accordingly dismissed.k. jagannatha shetty shetty and; k.n. saikia, jj.1. in this writ petition under article 32 of the constitution the validity of section 125 crpc has been challenged on the ground that the section unreasonably limits the maintenance to rs 500 for individual. section 125 provides a speedy remedy against starvation of the civil liabilities of parties. the order made thereunder is tentative and it is subject to the final determination of the rights in civil court. we, therefore, see no reason to issue rule nisi. writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
Judgment:

K. Jagannatha Shetty Shetty and; K.N. Saikia, JJ.

1. In this writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution the validity of Section 125 CrPC has been challenged on the Ground that the section unreasonably limits the maintenance to Rs 500 for individual. Section 125 provides a speedy remedy against starvation of the civil liabilities of parties. The order made thereunder is tentative and it is subject to the final determination of the rights in civil court. We, therefore, see no reason to issue rule nisi. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //