Skip to content


R.G. Shaw and Co. Ltd. Vs. Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. and Others - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Company

Court

Supreme Court of India

Decided On

Case Number

Transfer Petition (Civil)Nos. 267-71 of 1986, S.L.P. Nos. 9322, 9329 and 11393 of 1986, C.M.P. No.s

Judge

Reported in

1986(2)SCALE1265; (1987)1SCC82

Appellant

R.G. Shaw and Co. Ltd.

Respondent

Shaw Wallace and Co. Ltd. and Others

Excerpt:


.....passed by any court up-to-date - order is being made subject to rights and contentions of parties in this litigation which will be considered after holding of three meeting. - labour & servicesappointment: [s.b. sinha & dr. mukundakam sharma, jj] appellants amongst others rank listed by public service commission on requisition made by state no vacancy, however, filled by state - state passing order that no vacancy exists - order challenged by some rank listed candidates - high court on finding that vacancy position was wrongly reported directing state to appoint rank listed candidates - writ appeal filed by state - appellants getting impleaded in writ appeal - writ appellate court as per concession made by state directing appointment only of original petitioners held, appellants having approached court belatedly cannot complain of discrimination. moreover, merely because they are rank listed they have no right to be appointed. order1. we have heard learned counsel for the parties. we are of the view that the reports submitted by the chairman of the meetings should be accepted and the resolutions passed at the meetings should be given effect to. we accordingly do so.2. the board as constituted after the election will take charge of the affairs of the company and discharge its duties in accordance with law it is open to the reconstituted board to co-opt any person in accordance with law for the purpose of managing the affairs of the company.3. this order should not be construed as affecting the rights of the parties with regard to the ownership of the shares.4. these matters are disposed of accordingly.

Judgment:


ORDER

1. We have heard learned Counsel for the parties. We are of the view that the reports submitted by the Chairman of the Meetings should be accepted and the resolutions passed at the Meetings should be given effect to. We accordingly do so.

2. The Board as constituted after the election will take charge of the affairs of the Company and discharge its duties in accordance with law It is open to the reconstituted Board to co-opt any person in accordance with law for the purpose of managing the affairs of the Company.

3. This order should not be construed as affecting the rights of the parties with regard to the ownership of the shares.

4. These matters are disposed of accordingly.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //