Skip to content


Lisamma Vs. The Mahatma Gandhi University - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtKerala High Court
Decided On
Judge
AppellantLisamma
RespondentThe Mahatma Gandhi University
Excerpt:
.....to ext.p2 order of the respondent university, which indicates that all existing vacancies in the self financing institutions, and those held as guest faculties, are to be filled up with fresh contract faculties through walk-in-interview on or before 31.05.2015. it is the case of the petitioners in the writ petition that, while in their appointment orders, there is no indication as regards the term for which they were appointed, their services could not be terminated without any notice to them and on the basis of a unilateral decision taken by the respondent university to fill up the posts with fresh contract appointees.2. in a statement filed by the learned counsel for the respondent, it is stated as follows in paragraphs 3 to 7: "3. it is humbly submitted that the school of medical.....
Judgment:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR WEDNESDAY, THE5H DAY OF AUGUST201514TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 23489 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS:-: ------------------------------------------------------ 1. LISAMMA SEBASTIAN AGED49YEARS W/O.P.J.SEBASTIAN, PARAMPETT HOUSE, VATTUKULAM P.O. KADAPOOR, KOTTAYAM - 686 587.

2. BINDU R. AGED38YEARS, W/O.MR.K.M.ANIL KUMAR, KOVILAKATHU HOUSE, POOVARANY P.O., PAIKA, KOTTAYAM.

3. PREETHY R. KUMAR AGED31YEARS, W/O.ANOOP R., NIRAPPIL HOUSE, KOODAPPULAM P.O., RAMAPURAM, KOTTAYAM.

4. REMYAMOL P.S. AGED29YEARS W/O.GIRISH S., LAVANYA HOUSE, MALLOOSSERY P.O. KOTTAYAM.

5. ANJU JOSEPH AGED29YEARS W/O.PRINCE THOMAS, KUTTIKATTU HOUSE, POOVARANY P.O. PAIKA, KOTTAYAM.

6. REMYA RAJ AGED31YEARS W/O.ANOOP MOHAN, ADUKKUVELIL HOUSE, PUTHUPPALLY P.O. KOTTAYAM - 686 011.

7. LINI VISWAM AGED32YEARS, D/O.K.N.VISWAN, KOLLAMPARAMBIL HOUSE, PAMPADY P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686 502.

8. MARIYA JOSE, W/O.JINO JACOB, PUTHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, KUZHIMATTOM P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686 533.

9. ALPHONSA JOSEPH AGED66YEARS, W/O.P.A.JOSEPH, PUTTATHANKAL HOUSE, ST.MARY'S ROAD, KOTTAYAM - 686 575.

10. ANNAMMA JOHN AGED56YEARS W/O.MATHEW P.C., THENKARA KALIYAPURAYIL HOUSE MOOZHIKULANGARA P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686 601.

11. MOBY SARA MATHEW, W/O.SIJO LUKOSE, AKKATHEKETHIL HOUSE PERUMBAIKADU P.O., KOTTAYAM.

12. JINCY ABRAHAM AGED31YEARS W/O.VIPIN C.KURIAKOSE, CHILAMBATTUSSERY HOUSE ARPOOKARA EAST P.O., KOTTAYAM.

13. SINI JAMES AGED29YEARS, D/O.JAMES ANTONY, PUNNATHANIYIL HOUSE, MOONNILAVU P.O. VADAKKADU, KOTTAYAM - 686 586.

14. REJANI M.C. AGED29YEARS W/O.JOHNSON JOSEPH, ATHIKUZHIYL HOUSE, NEDUMANNI P.O. NEDUMKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM.

15. NISHA JOSE AGED29YEARS D/O.T.O.JOSE, THANNIYIL PUTHANPURACKAL HOUSE AMANAKKARA P.O., RAMAPURAM, KOTTAYAM - 686 576.

16. DIVYA S. AGED31YEARS D/O.SOMAN G., PATTERIKAROTTU HOUSE, ARUNAPURAM P.O. PALA, KOTTAYAM - 686 574.

17. SIMI K.K. AGED38YEARS W/O.PRAVEEN POTHEN, KOCHUTHEKKETHIL HOUSE, VELLAPADU PALA P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686 576.

18. HIMA SOMAN AGED28YEARS D/O.SOMAN A.K., AYYAMMELIL HOUSE, MARIKA P.O. KOOTHATTUKLAM, KOTTAYAM - 686 662.

19. SOUMYA KRISHNAN AGED30YEARS D/O.KRISHNAN P.K., PALARIL HOUSE, ASHTAMICHIRA P.O. THRISSUR - 680 731.

20. SONA P.N. AGED30YEARS W/O.ARAVIND T.S., PORUNNIKAL HOUSE, PERUMBALOOR P.O. PERINGAZHA, MUVATTUPUZHA - 696 673.

21. JILU MARIA JOSE AGED37YEARS D/O.JOSEPH CHAKO, KOONAMPARAYIL HOUSE, ARAKKULAM P.O. ASHOKA, IDUKKI - 685 591.

22. REGIN JOSEPH AGED51YEARS D/O.K.V.JOSEPH, KIZHAKKETHIL HOUSE, KANJIRATHANAM P.O. KOTTAYAM - 686 603.

23. AMBUJAM M.B. AGED62YEARS W/O.DR.SALIM KUMAR N., ARAKKAL, KUMMANNOOR P.O. PALA, KOTTAYAM.

24. KAVITHA K. AGED40YEARS W/O.SANIL KUMAR P.R., KALABHAVAN, ARPOOKARA EAST P.O. KOTTAYAM.

25. HARSHA PRADEEP AGED29YEARS D/O.PRADEEP RAJ, BLANTHAYIL HOUSE SREEKANDAMANGALAM P.O., ATHIRAMPUZHA KOTTAYAM - 686 562.

26. JYOTHI SUSAN VARGHESE AGED35YEARS W/O.RENJITH, KOONAMTHOTTIYIL HOUSE PUNNATHURA WEST P.O., PUNNATHURA, ETTUMANOOR KOTTAYAM.

27. LUCY ABRAHAM AGED51YEARS W/O.ADV.STEPHEN CHAZHIKATT, CHAZHIKATT HOUSE THELLAKOM P.O., KOTTAYAM - 686 630.

28. NEETHU JOSLIN AGED29YEARS W/O.MANU VINCENT, MUNDIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE, KURINJI P.O. KOTTAYAM.

29. MILY PAUL AGED29YEARS D/O.K.V.POULOSE, KOOLIMOOTTIL HOUSE, SOUTH MARADU P.O. MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM.

30. HONEY ZACHARIAS AGED37YEARS W/O.MANOSH MATHEW, PULICKAL HOUSE, PUTHUPPALLY P.O. KOTTAYAM.

31. JOSSY JOHN AGED36YEARS W/O.BINOY XAVIER KOLAMKALAYIL HOUSE, MANJOOR P.O. KURUPPANTHARA, KOTTAYAM - 686 603.

32. LIJEENA BAKER A. AGED30YEARS W/O.SHAKIR HUSSAIN, NADAKKAVIL PUTHIYA VEEDU HOUSE CHUNGOM WARD, ALAPPUZHA - 688 011.

33. MARY GEORGE AGED49YEARS W/O.BENNY MATHEW, MANNARAKATHU HOUSE, PONMUDI KONNATHADY, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK.

34. ASHA GOPAL AGED29YEARS W/O.SHASIKUMAR D., THUMBANAL HOUSE, AMBALAKAVALA KATTAPPANA, IDUKKI.

35. SHREELAYA THOMAS AGED29YEARS D/O.THOMAS P.L., POTHANPARAMBIL HOUSE, NEDUMKANDAM UDUMBANCHOLA.

36. VIDYA M. AGED27YEARS D/O.K.MURUKESAN, SUBUVILASAM, ADIMALI DEVIKULAM.

37. ROSHINI VARGHESE AGED35YEARS W/O.SIBICHAN JOSEPH, PARAPPALIL HOUSE, KATTAPPANA IDUKKI. BY ADVS.SRI.A.JAYASANKAR SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN SRI.MANU GOVIND SRI.S.SABARINADH SRI.ASHWIN SETHUMADHAVAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:-: -------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O., KOTTAYAM, KERALA PIN - 686 560, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR.

2. THE REGISTRAR MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY, PRIYADARSINI HILLS P.O. KOTTAYAM, KERALA, PIN - 686 560.

3. THE DIRECTOR SCHOOL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, GANDHINAGAR P.O. KOTTAYAM - 686 008. R1-R3 BY ADV. SRI.VARUGHESE M.EASO, SC, M.G.UNIVERSITY R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SMT. LOWSY A. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON0508-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C).No. 23489 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1. A TRUE COPY OF GOVERNMENT ORDER

NO.G.O (MS) NO.552/2014/H.EDN DATED1907.2014. EXHIBIT P2. A TRUE COPY OF UNIVERSITY ORDER

NO.U.O.NO.2868/SFI/2015/ADMN DATED2105.2015. EXHIBIT P3. A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION NUMBER SME/GNR/E1/IGL/NDKM/2009 DATED2303.2010 WHEREBY I WAS APPOINTED TO THE SERVICES OF THE3D RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL // True copy // PA to Judge das A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

=========================================== W.P.(C). No. 23489 of 2015 ===================================================== Dated this the 5th day of August, 2015 JUDGMENT

The petitioners, who are stated to have been appointed as Guest Lecturers (Full Time Internal) in different centres of the School of Medical Education- Institute of Nursing Education, under the respondent University, approached this Court, apprehending that their services would be terminated consequent to Ext.P2 order of the respondent University, which indicates that all existing vacancies in the self financing institutions, and those held as Guest Faculties, are to be filled up with fresh contract faculties through walk-in-interview on or before 31.05.2015. It is the case of the petitioners in the writ petition that, while in their appointment orders, there is no indication as regards the term for which they were appointed, their services could not be terminated without any notice to them and on the basis of a unilateral decision taken by the respondent University to fill up the posts with fresh contract appointees.

2. In a statement filed by the learned counsel for the respondent, it is stated as follows in paragraphs 3 to 7: "3. It is humbly submitted that the School of Medical Education (SME) is one of the Self Financing Institutions, established and maintained under the direct control of the -2- W.P.(C). No. 23489 of 2015 University. It is governed by special rules framed and accepted by the University, as per UO1318SFI/2010/Admn, for Self Financing Institutions. As per special rules a teacher in Self Financing Institution means a teacher appointed in Self Financing Institutions in four modes ie, temporary, contract, Guest, External Guest. It is provided as per the Chapter 2 Rule 2, the syndicate is competent to abolish any of the teaching post of self financing institution.

4. It is further submitted that the teachers of the Self Financing Institutions directly run by the University shall be appointed after advertisement/press release inviting applications or by conducting walk-in-interview. The petitioners belong to the category of Guest faculty. There is no mention about the selection of Guest faculties in M.G. University Act or Statutes.

5. It is also submitted that the Guest faculty means faculty as and when they are called for/terminated. The engagement of Guest lecturer is not against any substantive post. Guest Lecturers are engaged by the University and also by the respective Directors after conducting walk-in-interview. The Government of Kerala had issued an Exhibit P1 order G.O.(MS) No.552/2014/H.Edn date.19.07.2014 regarding the terms and conditions of teaching staff working in unaided colleges/Self financing Institutions.

6. It is submitted that the Syndicate had considered the Exhibit P1, and resolved to enhance the existing remuneration of teaching/non teaching staff working in Self Financing Institutions established and maintained under the direct control of the University. Later in continuation of the said decision, the Syndicate has further resolved that "All the existing vacancies in Self Financing Institutions and those held as guest faculties are to be filled up through walk in interview on or before 31.05.2015." However this decision has not been implemented. As per Indian Nursing Council norms Guest Faculty is not counted for staff strength. A file has been submitted for clarification in this regard.

7. In this circumstances it is submitted that, the allegation of the petitioners ie, the university is taking steps to terminate the employment of all the petitioners and to recruit afresh for the -3- W.P.(C). No. 23489 of 2015 said posts is baseless. The University will implement the decision only after getting clarification from the Syndicate which the petitioners can note in time. Hence the Writ petition is premature. No cause of action has been arisen at this stage." 3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent University. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made across the bar, I find that, inasmuch as it is the definite stand of the respondent University in the statement filed before this Court that the University will implement a decision with regard to termination of services of the petitioners, only after getting clarification from the syndicate, of which the petitioners will also get due notice, the writ petition at this stage is premature. Accordingly, taking note of the stand of the respondent University as borne out from their statement, this writ petition is closed as premature. Sd/- A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE das


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //