Skip to content


Prasanna Kumar Nayak Vs. Trilochan Routray and anr. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
SubjectInsurance;Motor Vehicles
CourtOrissa High Court
Decided On
Judge
Reported in2(2000)ACC310; 89(2000)CLT675
AppellantPrasanna Kumar Nayak
RespondentTrilochan Routray and anr.
Cases ReferredC) Shankarayya and Anr. v. United India Insurance Co. Limited and Anr.
Excerpt:
.....high court. it has not made any provision for filing appeal to a division bench against the judgment or decree or order of a single judge. no letters patent appeal shall lie against a judgment/order passed by a single judge in an appeal arising out of a proceeding under a special act. sections 100-a [as inserted by act 22 of 2002] & 104:[dr. b.s. chauhan, cj, l. mohapatra & a.s. naidu, jj] writ appeal held, a writ appeal shall lie against judgment/orders passed by single judge in a writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india. in a writ application filed under articles 226 and 227 of constitution, if any order/judgment/decree is passed in exercise of jurisdiction under article 226, a writ appeal will lie. but, no writ appeal will lie against a.....p.k. misra, j.1. misc. appeal no. 661/93 has been filed by the claimant claiming higher compensation, whereas misc. appeal no. 622/93 has been filed by the insurer.2. the insurer in its appeal has mainly challenged the findings of the claims tribunal regarding negligence of the driver and the quantum. in view of the decisions of the supreme court reported in 1997 (2) tac 1 (sc) : i (1997) acc 241 (sc) narendra kumar and anr. v. yarenissa and ors. and 1998 (2) tac 379 (sc) : i (1999) acc 497 (sc) shankarayya and anr. v. united india insurance co. limited and anr., such questions are not available to be raised by the insurance company without following the provisions incorporated in section 110-c (2-a) of the motor vehicles act, 1939. moreover, the finding relating to negligence is based on.....
Judgment:

P.K. Misra, J.

1. Misc. Appeal No. 661/93 has been filed by the claimant claiming higher compensation, whereas Misc. Appeal No. 622/93 has been filed by the Insurer.

2. The Insurer in its appeal has mainly challenged the findings of the Claims Tribunal regarding negligence of the driver and the quantum. In view of the decisions of the Supreme Court reported in 1997 (2) TAC 1 (SC) : I (1997) ACC 241 (SC) Narendra Kumar and Anr. v. Yarenissa and Ors. and 1998 (2) TAC 379 (SC) : I (1999) ACC 497 (SC) Shankarayya and Anr. v. United India Insurance Co. Limited and Anr., such questions are not available to be raised by the Insurance Company without following the provisions incorporated in Section 110-C (2-A) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. Moreover, the finding relating to negligence is based on evidence on record and there is hardly any scope for interference.

3. The Insurer has submitted that the payment of Rs. 25,000/- as compensation appears to be on higher side, whereas the claimant has submitted otherwise and prayed for higher compensation. The accident had occurred in December, 1985. The Tribunal has directed for payment of Rs. 25,000/- with interest at the rate of nine per cent from the date of application, i.e. 17.5.1986 till the date of realisation. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the nature of injuries and keeping in view the awards made in similar cases by various Courts, it cannot be said that award of a sum of Rs. 25,000/- is either excessively high or excessively low so as to warrant interference in the appeal. Accordingly, both the appeals are dismissed.

4. It appears that a sum of Rs. 12,500/- has been deposited in this Court by the Insurance Company. The said amount alongwith accrued interest may be disbursed to claimant Prasanna Kumar Nayak the Insurance Company is directed to pay the balance amount by 30th April, 2000, alongwith interest as directed by the Claims Tribunal. However, if the said amount is not deposited by 30th April, 2000, the unpaid amount shall carry interest at the rate of fifteen per thereafter with effect from 1.5.2000. Interest shall be calculated on sum of Rs. 25,000/- from the date of claim application, i.e. 17.5.1986, till date on which the cheque for Rs. 12,500/- was deposited in this Court and thereafter on sum of Rs. 12,500/- till date of payment. The deposited amount alongwith accrued interest shall be disbursed within a period of two weeks. Deposit of the balance amount should be made before the Claims Tribunal which shall thereafter disburse the amount to the claimant.

5. Subject to the aforesaid direction, both the Misc. Appeals are dismissed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //