Skip to content


Kalpana Trading Vs. N.C.L. Industries Ltd. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Company

Court

Orissa High Court

Decided On

Case Number

Company Act Case No. 11 of 1994

Judge

Reported in

AIR1995Ori287; [1996]85CompCas946(Orissa)

Acts

Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 10(3)

Appellant

Kalpana Trading

Respondent

N.C.L. Industries Ltd.

Advocates:

B.P. Das, B Pr. Das, S. Das & D.N. Mohanty

Excerpt:


.....of appeal, it denotes that the appeal cannot be admitted to consideration unless other requirements are complied with. the provision of sub-section (1) of section 173 permits filing of an appeal against an award within 90 days with a rider in the first proviso that such appeal filed cannot be entertained unless the statutory deposit is made. the period of limitation is applicable only to the filing of the appeal and not to the deposit to be made. it, therefore, appears that an appeal filed under section 173 cannot be entertained i.e. cannot be admitted for consideration unless the statutory deposit is made and for this purpose the court has the discretion either to grant time to make the deposit or not. no formal order condoning the delay is necessary, an order of adjournment would suffice. the provisions of limitation embodied in the substantive provision of the sub-section (1) of section 173 of the act does not extend to the provision relating to the deposit of statutory amount as embodies in the first proviso. therefore an appeal filed within the period of limitation or within the extended period of limitation, cannot be admitted for hearing on merit unless the..........pay the sum so due and the company has for three weeks thereafter neglected to pay the sum, or to secure or compound for it to the reasonable satisfaction of the creditor, demand referred to in clause(a) of sub-section (1) of section 434 shall be deemed to have been duly given under the hand of the creditor if it is signed by any agent or legal adviser duly authorised on his behalf, or in the case of a firm, if it is signed by any such agent or legal adviser or by any member of the firm. petitioner's case is that notwithstanding several letters by registered post, the company has failed to pay the amount which according to it is due. 3. it is not necessary to deal with !he question whether there has been any demand or inability of the company to pay its debts, in view of the fact that this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the application. section 10 of the act deals with jurisdiction of courts. the said provision reads as follows : 'section 10. jurisdiction of courts.- (1) the court having jurisdiction under this act shall be- (a) the high court having jurisdiction in relation to the place at which the registered office of the company concerned is situate, except to the.....

Judgment:


Pasayat, J.

1. This is an application for winding up of M/s. N.C.L. Industries Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the 'company') in terms of Sections 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956 (in short, the 'Act'), on the ground that it is unable to pay its debts. Petition has been styled as 'creditors' application' in order to invoke powers under Sections 434 and 439 of the Act.

2. Section 434 of the Act envisages the situations in which a company shall be deemed to be unable to pay its debts. Section 433 enumerates the circumstances in which a company would be wound up by the Court. One of the circumstances is if company is unable to pay its debts. In terms of Section 434 of the Act, a company shall be deemed to be unable to pay its debts if a creditor, by assignment or otherwise, to whom the company is indebted in a sum exceeding five hundred rupees then due, has served on the company, by causing it to be delivered at the registered office, by registered post or otherwise, a demand under his hand requiring the company to pay the sum so due and the company has for three weeks thereafter neglected to pay the sum, or to secure or compound for it to the reasonable satisfaction of the creditor, Demand referred to in Clause(a) of Sub-section (1) of Section 434 shall be deemed to have been duly given under the hand of the creditor if it is signed by any agent or legal adviser duly authorised on his behalf, or in the case of a firm, if it is signed by any such agent or legal adviser or by any member of the firm. Petitioner's case is that notwithstanding several letters by registered post, the company has failed to pay the amount which according to it is due.

3. It is not necessary to deal with !he question whether there has been any demand or inability of the company to pay its debts, in view of the fact that this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the application. Section 10 of the Act deals with jurisdiction of Courts. The said provision reads as follows :

'Section 10. Jurisdiction of Courts.- (1) The Court having jurisdiction under this Act shall be-

(a) the High Court having jurisdiction in relation to the place at which the registered office of the company concerned is situate, except to the extent to which jurisdiction has been conferred on any District Court or District Courts subordinate to that High Court in pursuance of Sub-section (2); and

(b)where jurisdiction has been so conferred, the District Court in regard to matters falling within the scope of the jurisdiction conferred, in respect of companies having their registered offices in the district.

(2) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette and subject tosuch restrictions, limitations and conditionsas it thinks fit empower any District Court toexercise all or any of the jurisdiction conferred by this Act upon the Court, not beingthe jurisdiction conferred-

(a) in respect of companies generally, by Sections 237, 291, 394, 395 and 397 to 407, both inclusive;

(b) in respect of companies with a paid-up share capital of not less than one lakh of rupees by Part VII (Sections 425 to 560) and the other provisions of this Act relating to the winding-up of companies.

(3) For the purposes of jurisdiction to wind-up companies, the expression 'registered office' means the place which has longest been the registered office of the companyduring the six months immediately preceding the presentation of the petition for winding-up.'

Sub-sect ion (1) provides that for the purposes of jurisdiction to wind-up companies, the expression 'registered office' means the place which has longest been the registered office of the company during the six months immediately preceding the presentation of the petition for winding-up. The Court having jurisdiction under the Act is High Court having jurisdiction in relation to the place at which registered office of the company concerned is situate, except to the extent to which jurisdiction has been conferred on any District Courts subordinate to High Court in pursuance of sub-section (2). Except to the extent to which any jurisdiction is expressly conferred on the District Court either by the Act or by the Central Government by noti-fication in the Official Gazette, all residuary jurisdiction under the Act is vested only in the High Courts. In the petition itself, it has been accepted that registered office of the company is at Hyderabad. In that view of the matter, this Court has no jurisdiction to deal with this application.

The application is accordingly not entertained.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //