Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jainser and ors. Vs. Pancham Singh and ors.

Jainser and ors. vs Pancham Singh and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Madhya Pradesh Decided Apr 19, 2006
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/513331

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Madhya Pradesh High Court
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Insurance;Motor Vehicles

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

- MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988[C.A.No.59/1988] Section 166; [A.K. Patnaik, CJ, A.K. Gohil & S. Samvatsar, JJ] Application for compensation for personal injury Death of injured claimant subsequently for some other reasons Held, Claim for personal injury will abate on the death of claimant. Claim will not survive to ...

Key legal issue
Insurance;Motor Vehicles

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jainser and ors.

Respondent

Pancham Singh and ors.

Legal References

Reported In
II(2006)ACC737

Excerpt

- motor vehicles act, 1988[c.a.no.59/1988] section 166; [a.k. patnaik, cj, a.k. gohil & s. samvatsar, jj] application for compensation for personal injury death of injured claimant subsequently for some other reasons held, claim for personal injury will abate on the death of claimant. claim will not survive to his legal representative except as regards claim for pecuniary loss to estate of claimant. - 10,000 towards consortium and loss of love and affection, which appears to be on lower side and no amount has been awarded towards funeral expenses and loss of estate. 1,80,000loss of love and affection rs......submits that the amount awarded is on lower side. it is submitted that out of this amount rs. 1,56,000 has been awarded towards loss of future income and rs. 10,000 has been awarded towards other heads. it is submitted that the multiplier of 13 has wrongly been applied while age of the deceased was 45 years at the time of accident and as per second schedule of motor vehicles act, the multiplier of 17 ought to have been applied. it is submitted that learned tribunal committed error in assessing the income of the deceased @ rs. 50 per day while deceased was doing the business of milk and deceased was having agricultural land, therefore, the income was on higher side.5. learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 submits that amount awarded by the learned tribunal is just and proper.6. from perusal of the record, it appears that no error has been committed by learned tribunal in assessing the income of deceased @ rs. 50 per day. so far as multiplier is concerned, since the age of the deceased was 45 years, therefore, as per second schedule of the motor vehicles act, multiplier of 15 ought to have been applied. similarly, learned tribunal has awarded rs. 10,000 towards consortium and loss of love and affection, which appears to be on lower side and no amount has been awarded towards funeral expenses and loss of estate. therefore, the appellants are entitled for the following amount of compensation:loss of dependency rs. 1,80,000loss of love and affection rs. 15,000loss of consortium rs. 10,000loss of estate rs. 3,000towards funeral expenses rs. 2,0007. the appellants are entitled for a total sum of rs. 2,10,000. therefore, the amount of award is enhanced from rs. 1,66,000 to rs. 2,10,000. the enhanced amount shall carry interest @ 6% per annum from the date of application.8. with the aforesaid modification, appeal stands disposed of.

Full Judgment

N.K. Mody, J.

1. Since the respondent No. 3 is responsible for the payment of compensation, therefore, the service of notice on respondent Nos. 1 and 2 is not necessary and they be exempted from serving respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

2. With the consent of the parties, the case is heard finally.

3. Being aggrieved by the inadequacy of the amount awarded vide award dated 18.2.1998 passed by MACT, Bhind in claim case No. 5/1997 whereby the learned Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs. 1,66,000 along with interest @ 12% per annum, the present appeal has been filed.

4. Learned Counsel for the appellants submits that the amount awarded is on lower side. It is submitted that out of this amount Rs. 1,56,000 has been awarded towards loss of future income and Rs. 10,000 has been awarded towards other heads. It is submitted that the multiplier of 13 has wrongly been applied while age of the deceased was 45 years at the time of accident and as per Second Schedule of Motor Vehicles Act, the multiplier of 17 ought to have been applied. It is submitted that learned Tribunal committed error in assessing the income of the deceased @ Rs. 50 per day while deceased was doing the business of milk and deceased was having agricultural land, therefore, the income was on higher side.

5. Learned Counsel for the respondent No. 3 submits that amount awarded by the learned Tribunal is just and proper.

6. From perusal of the record, it appears that no error has been committed by learned Tribunal in assessing the income of deceased @ Rs. 50 per day. So far as multiplier is concerned, since the age of the deceased was 45 years, therefore, as per Second Schedule of the Motor Vehicles Act, multiplier of 15 ought to have been applied. Similarly, learned Tribunal has awarded Rs. 10,000 towards consortium and loss of love and affection, which appears to be on lower side and no amount has been awarded towards funeral expenses and loss of estate. Therefore, the appellants are entitled for the following amount of compensation:

Loss of dependency Rs. 1,80,000Loss of love and affection Rs. 15,000Loss of consortium Rs. 10,000Loss of estate Rs. 3,000Towards funeral expenses Rs. 2,000

7. The appellants are entitled for a total sum of Rs. 2,10,000. Therefore, the amount of award is enhanced from Rs. 1,66,000 to Rs. 2,10,000. The enhanced amount shall carry interest @ 6% per annum from the date of application.

8. With the aforesaid modification, appeal stands disposed of.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial