Skip to content


Pamecha Motor Finance Vs. Smt. Shakilabano and ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
SubjectMotor Vehicles
CourtMadhya Pradesh High Court
Decided On
Case NumberMisc. Appeal No. 402 of 1995
Judge
Reported in1996CriLJ2754
ActsMotor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 140
AppellantPamecha Motor Finance
RespondentSmt. Shakilabano and ors.
Appellant AdvocateS.S. Kemkar, Adv.
Respondent AdvocateJ.K. Joshi, Adv. (for Nos. 1 to 4) and ;A.S. Garg, Adv. (for No. 5)
Excerpt:
.....mandatory for a distiller to supply country liquor in sealed bottles and not otherwise. therefore, packaging and bottling of liquor come within the ambit and sweep of manufacture within the meaning of clause (f) of section 2 central excise act, 1944 in view of the definition contained in section 65(76b) of the finance act especially keeping in view the exclusionary facet and further regard being had to the circular issued by central board of excise and customs......compensation as interim relief in view of the provisions of section 140 of m. v. act on account of accidental death of deceased munnakhan.4. shri a.s. garg, appearing for resp. 5 submitted that the addl. c.j.m. jawad has decided the criminal prosecution arising out of the said accident bearing no. cr. c. 221/94 on 4-11-95 and had acquitted jagdish s/o bherulal jaiswal, the alleged driver of the said tractor. it is his argument that the said criminal court has come to the conclusion after recording the evidence that the said tractor was not at all involved in any accident which resulted in the death of deceasd munna. he further argued that the said criminal court held after recording the evidence that jagdish was not driving the tractor which caused the accidental death of munna, for whom.....
Judgment:

J.G. Chitre, J.

1. This appeal has been preferred by M/s Pamacha Motor Finance, the appellant for assailing the interim award which has been passed by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Neemuch on 13-1-95 by which the appellant has been directed to pay interim compensation of Rs. 25,000/- to Respondents 1 to 4 in view of provisions of Section 140 of Motor Vehicles Act 1988 (herein after referred to as M.V. Act.).

2. The main contention of the appellant is that he is neither owner of the tractor which is the alleged cause of said accident nor the employee of the driver of the said tractor, and thereore, he cannot be saddled with the responsibility of paying the interim compensation to the claimants (Resp. 1 to 4) in view of the provisions of Section 140 of M. V. Act.

3. Shri Z.A. Khan learned counsel appearing for Respondent 1 to 4 submitted that the deceased died in the accident which took place on 2-4-94 at 10-30 a.m. on Jawad Road when Jagdish the driver was driving the tractor M.P. 14-A -8623. He submitted that the respondents 1 to 4 are entitled to get the compensation as interim relief in view of the provisions of Section 140 of M. V. Act on account of accidental death of deceased Munnakhan.

4. Shri A.S. Garg, appearing for Resp. 5 submitted that the Addl. C.J.M. Jawad has decided the criminal prosecution arising out of the said accident bearing No. Cr. C. 221/94 on 4-11-95 and had acquitted Jagdish S/o Bherulal Jaiswal, the alleged driver of the said tractor. It is his argument that the said criminal Court has come to the conclusion after recording the evidence that the said tractor was not at all involved in any accident which resulted in the death of deceasd Munna. He further argued that the said criminal Court held after recording the evidence that Jagdish was not driving the tractor which caused the accidental death of Munna, for whom the claimants are claiming the compensation.

5. After perusing the certified copy of the judgment in the matter of said prosecution and after hearing the arguments advanced on behalf of the contesting parties and seeing impugned interim award, I come to the conclusion that the matter needs to be probed further by MACT for its own conclusion in respect of the allegation made by the claimants that Munna died accidental death on 2-4-94 at 10-30 a.m. on Jawad road when allegedly Jagdish S/o Bherulal Jaiswal was driving the tractor bearing No. MP-I4-A8623. The tribunal after recording necessary evidence should come to a conclusion whether the said tractor was involved in the said accident and it was driven by Jagdish S/o Bherulal R/o Jawad in view of the judgment of the criminal Court in the matter of Cr. C. No. 221/94, which has been decided on 4-11-95.

6. So far as present appeal is concerned the appeal will have to be allowed because by reading all relevant provisions of M.V. Act, it cannot be held that appellant who happens to be financer of the tractor in question can be saddled with the liability of paying interim award to the claimants in view of the provisions of Section 140 of M.V. Act He needs to be and stands exonerated so far as liability of paying interim compensation amount to claimants in view of Section 140 of M.V. Act. So far as present matter is concerned and the alleged accident and accidental death of Munna is concerned the claimants be not given the amount of interim award if it has been deposited in the office of tribunal till tribunal passes an independent order after recording some evidence for the purpose of coming to the conclusion which is necessary to be arrived at in view of Section 140 of MV Act. The amount which has been deposited by the appellant in the office of Tribunal be returned to him. So far as the appeal is concerned, no order as to costs in view of the facts and circumstances of the case. The record be despatched forthwith to tribunal.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //