Skip to content


Gurumel Singh Vs. State of Chhattisgarh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Criminal

Court

Chhattisgarh High Court

Decided On

Case Number

M.C.R.C. No. 1113 of 2005

Judge

Reported in

II(2005)DMC747

Acts

Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 439; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 307 and 498A

Appellant

Gurumel Singh

Respondent

State of Chhattisgarh

Appellant Advocate

Uttam Pandey and; Arun Kochar, Advs.

Respondent Advocate

Satish Gupta, Dy. G.A.

Disposition

Application allowed

Excerpt:


- - 10,000/- with one surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned court, he shall be released on bail......in nature and she is already discharged from the hospital on 15.3.2005, therefore, taking into consideration that the victim and the applicant are husband and wife, he should be enlarged on ball.4. on the other hand, learned counsel for the state opposes the bail application.5. i have heard learned counsel for the parties.6. taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and further considering that the injuries are described as simple in nature and that the victim has already been discharged from the hospital. i consider present to be a fit case where the applicant should be extended the facility of bail under section 439 of the cr.pc accordingly, the application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of applicant namely gurumel singh furnishing a personal bond in the sum of rs. 10,000/- with one surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned court, he shall be released on bail.parties are entitled for certified copy of the order.

Judgment:


Dhirendra Mishra, J.

1. The applicant has preferred this application under Section 439 of the Cr.PC as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 395/2005, registered in Police Station, Chhawani, for the offences punishable under Sections 498A and 307 of the IPC.

2. The incident is of 11.3.2005 when the applicant who is the husband of the victim assaulted his wife by khurpi and caused her injuries over her head. The victim was hospitalized by her mother-in-law and she was discharged on 15.3.2005. Subsequently, the victim lodged a report after discharge stating that she was assaulted by the applicant in the name of demand of dowry.

3. Learned Counsel for the applicant submits that the injuries caused to the victim were simply in nature and she is already discharged from the hospital on 15.3.2005, therefore, taking into consideration that the victim and the applicant are husband and wife, he should be enlarged on ball.

4. On the other hand, learned Counsel for the State opposes the bail application.

5. I have heard learned Counsel for the parties.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and further considering that the injuries are described as simple in nature and that the victim has already been discharged from the hospital. I consider present to be a fit case where the applicant should be extended the facility of bail under Section 439 of the Cr.PC Accordingly, the application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of applicant namely Gurumel Singh furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- with one surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Court, he shall be released on bail.

Parties are entitled for certified copy of the order.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //