Skip to content


Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. K.N. Agarwal - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Direct Taxation

Court

Allahabad High Court

Decided On

Case Number

Income-tax Application No. 126 of 1990

Judge

Reported in

[1991]189ITR378(All)

Acts

Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 256

Appellant

Commissioner of Income-tax

Respondent

K.N. Agarwal

Excerpt:


- 1. by this application the department is asking this court to refer the following question under section 256(2) of the income-tax. act, 1961 :'whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the tribunal was justified in law in concluding that the share income was subject to overriding charges to the extent of l/3rd each in favour of wife andminor child and the assessment is a substantive one in favour of theassessee ?' 2. we do not think that there is any substance in this application inasmuch as the tribunal has merely followed the judgment of this court in shiv narain agarwal v. cit : [1983]139itr999(all) . the ground on which the reference is sought is that an appeal is pending in the supreme court against the judgment of this court. it is not brought to our notice that the supreme court has suspended or stayed the operation of the judgment of this court. in the circumstances, the ground assigned is not sufficient for making a reference.3. the application is, accordingly, dismissed.

Judgment:


1. By this application the Department is asking this court to refer the following question under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax. Act, 1961 :

'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in concluding that the share income was subject to overriding charges to the extent of l/3rd each in favour of wife andminor child and the assessment is a substantive one in favour of theassessee ?'

2. We do not think that there is any substance in this application inasmuch as the Tribunal has merely followed the judgment of this court in Shiv Narain Agarwal v. CIT : [1983]139ITR999(All) . The ground on which the reference is sought is that an appeal is pending in the Supreme Court against the judgment of this court. It is not brought to our notice that the Supreme Court has suspended or stayed the operation of the judgment of this court. In the circumstances, the ground assigned is not sufficient for making a reference.

3. The application is, accordingly, dismissed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //