Oberoi Flight Services Vs. C.S.T.

Oberoi Flight Services vs C.S.T.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Mar 13, 2007

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/45071

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/45071
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge: S Kang, Vice, N T C.N.B.
Decided On: Mar 13, 2007
Subject: Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue: Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Oberoi Flight Services

Respondent

C.S.T.

Legal References

Reported In: (2007)10STJ41CESTATNew(Delhi)

Excerpt

2. the stay application is in respect of service tax demand of about rs. 38 lakhs and equal amount of penalty imposed under the impugned order. the tax demand is on the ground that appellant is rendering "airport service" by keeping the "executive lounge & snack bar" at transit area in terminal-ii of delhi airport.3. the services authorized in the executive lounge by the airport authority of india are the following: the licensee will manage the executive lounge & snack bar counter and provide the facilities of: g) communication facility including std/isd/fax - video conferencing etc.it is by treating the above service as airport service that the tax demand has been made.4. it will be seen from para 4 above that the executive lounge provides several services like cable tv, food and telecom services in the executive lounge. these services are not airport services, as they have nothing to do with the arrival or departure of aircraft, which is the substance of airport service. it is also to be seen that some of these services like cable tv, phone etc. are separately leviable to service tax under respective headings. the mere fact that a service is rendered within airport area does not give that service the character of airport service. to explain, cable tv service, telecom service, money change service etc. rendered in the lounge, would not lose their character and become airport service, merely because of the place where they are rendered. in this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the finding that the appellant is rendering airport service is not viable.the appellant is in hospitality business and the running of the executive lounge to provide facilities to passengers is also part of that (hospitality) service and not airport service.5. in view of what is stated above, we are of the opinion that the tax demand is not viable. accordingly, stay application is allowed and recovery stayed till the disposal of the appeal.

Full Judgment

2. The stay application is in respect of service tax demand of about Rs. 38 lakhs and equal amount of penalty imposed under the impugned order. The tax demand is on the ground that appellant is rendering "Airport service" by keeping the "Executive Lounge & Snack Bar" at transit area in Terminal-II of Delhi Airport.

3. The services authorized in the Executive Lounge by the Airport Authority of India are the following: The Licensee will manage the Executive Lounge & Snack Bar counter and provide the facilities of: g) Communication facility including STD/ISD/Fax - Video Conferencing etc.

It is by treating the above service as Airport service that the tax demand has been made.

4. It will be seen from para 4 above that the Executive Lounge provides several services like Cable TV, Food and Telecom services in the executive lounge. These services are not airport services, as they have nothing to do with the arrival or departure of aircraft, which is the substance of airport service. It is also to be seen that some of these services like Cable TV, Phone etc. are separately leviable to service tax under respective headings. The mere fact that a service is rendered within airport area does not give that service the character of airport service. To explain, Cable TV service, Telecom service, Money change service etc. rendered in the lounge, would not lose their character and become airport service, merely because of the place where they are rendered. In this view of the matter, we are of the opinion that the finding that the appellant is rendering airport service is not viable.

The appellant is in hospitality business and the running of the executive lounge to provide facilities to passengers is also part of that (hospitality) service and not airport service.

5. In view of what is stated above, we are of the opinion that the tax demand is not viable. Accordingly, stay application is allowed and recovery stayed till the disposal of the appeal.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Oberoi Flight Services vs C.S.T. Same Subject Miscellaneous Same Judge S Kang, Vice, N T C.N.B.