Harsh Marketing Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Harsh Marketing vs Commissioner of Central Excise

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai Decided Jan 24, 2007

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/44668

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/44668
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Judge: T Anjaneyulu
Decided On: Jan 24, 2007
Subject: Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue: Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Harsh Marketing

Respondent

Commissioner of Central Excise

Legal References

Reported In: (2007)(116)ECC579

Excerpt

2. this appeal was dismissed for non filing of the certified copies of order-in-original and order-in-appeal on 14.8.06. it is submitted that the representative of the appellant company came late from pane on the date of hearing. by the time he came to the tribunal, the appeal was dismissed. on the same date the appellant said to have been complied with the objections raised in the show cause notice and filed all the documents. the covering letter under exhibit -a also shows endorsement of the registry regarding filing of the documents. as sufficient cause is shown for restoration of the appeal the same is restored hereby.list the appeal on 5.3.07. no further notice.

Full Judgment

2. This appeal was dismissed for non filing of the certified copies of Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal on 14.8.06. It is submitted that the representative of the appellant company came late from Pane on the date of hearing. By the time he came to the Tribunal, the appeal was dismissed. On the same date the appellant said to have been complied with the objections raised in the show cause notice and filed all the documents. The covering letter under Exhibit -A also shows endorsement of the Registry regarding filing of the documents. As sufficient cause is shown for restoration of the appeal the same is restored hereby.

List the appeal on 5.3.07. No further notice.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumb... Same Parties Harsh Marketing vs Commissioner of Central Excise Same Subject Excise Same Judge T Anjaneyulu