Harsh Marketing Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise - Court Judgment

Excerpt:

2. this appeal was dismissed for non filing of the certified copies of order-in-original and order-in-appeal on 14.8.06. it is submitted that the representative of the appellant company came late from pane on the date of hearing. by the time he came to the tribunal, the appeal was dismissed. on the same date the appellant said to have been complied with the objections raised in the show cause notice and filed all the documents. the covering letter under exhibit -a also shows endorsement of the registry regarding filing of the documents. as sufficient cause is shown for restoration of the appeal the same is restored hereby.list the appeal on 5.3.07. no further notice.

Judgment:

2. This appeal was dismissed for non filing of the certified copies of Order-in-Original and Order-in-Appeal on 14.8.06. It is submitted that the representative of the appellant company came late from Pane on the date of hearing. By the time he came to the Tribunal, the appeal was dismissed. On the same date the appellant said to have been complied with the objections raised in the show cause notice and filed all the documents. The covering letter under Exhibit -A also shows endorsement of the Registry regarding filing of the documents. As sufficient cause is shown for restoration of the appeal the same is restored hereby.

List the appeal on 5.3.07. No further notice.