Skip to content


K. Sulochana Vs. District Collector and District Magistrate and ors. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Subject

Civil

Court

Andhra Pradesh High Court

Decided On

Case Number

WP Nos. 18827 and 18828 of 2004

Judge

Reported in

2005(4)ALD539; 2005(5)ALT241

Acts

Wakf Act, 1995 - Sections 21, 23, 28, 32, 35, 54, 55 and 74; Indian Registration Act - Sections 69

Appellant

K. Sulochana

Respondent

District Collector and District Magistrate and ors.

Appellant Advocate

P. Vengala Reddy, Adv.

Respondent Advocate

Government Pleader for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and ;S.M. Subhani, Adv. for Respondent No. 3

Disposition

Petition allowed

Excerpt:


- orderp.s. narayana, j.1. heard sri p. vengal reddy, counsel for writ petitioners in both to the writ petitions, the learned government pleader for revenue and the learned standing counsel sri s.m. subhani representing the a.p. state wakf board.2. the writ petitioners in these writ petitions k. sulochana and k. sai baba guptha respectively had questioned rc.no. e8/2262/2002 dated 17-8-2002 of the 1st respondent, district collector and district magistrate, kurnool on the ground that the same is illegal, without jurisdiction, arbitrary and unreasonable and prayed for such other suitable reliefs. in view of the fact that common questions are involved both these writ petitions are being disposed of by a common order.3. the proceedings of the collector and district magistrate, kurnool dated 17-8-2002, the impugned notice in these writ petitions, reads as hereunder :proceedings of the collector and districtmagistrate, kurnoolpresent : sri g. sai prasad, i.a.s.rc.e8/2262/2002dated 17-8-2002sub: registration of wakf properties -certain instructions - issued.ref: representation of the muslims service society, dated 22-7-2002.

Judgment:


ORDER

P.S. Narayana, J.

1. Heard Sri P. Vengal Reddy, Counsel for writ petitioners in both to the writ petitions, the learned Government Pleader for Revenue and the learned Standing Counsel Sri S.M. Subhani representing the A.P. State Wakf Board.

2. The writ petitioners in these writ petitions K. Sulochana and K. Sai Baba Guptha respectively had questioned Rc.No. E8/2262/2002 dated 17-8-2002 of the 1st respondent, District Collector and District Magistrate, Kurnool on the ground that the same is illegal, without jurisdiction, arbitrary and unreasonable and prayed for such other suitable reliefs. In view of the fact that common questions are involved both these writ petitions are being disposed of by a common order.

3. The proceedings of the Collector and District Magistrate, Kurnool dated 17-8-2002, the impugned notice in these writ petitions, reads as hereunder :

Proceedings of the Collector and District

Magistrate, Kurnool

Present : Sri G. Sai Prasad, I.A.S.

Rc.E8/2262/2002

Dated 17-8-2002

Sub: Registration of wakf properties -Certain instructions - Issued.

Ref: Representation of the Muslims Service Society, dated 22-7-2002.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //