Royale Impex Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Royale Impex vs Commissioner of Customs

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Mar 15, 2005

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/38476

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/38476
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge: S T S.S., T Anjaneyulu
Decided On: Mar 15, 2005
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Royale Impex

Respondent

Commissioner of Customs

Legal References

Reported In: (2005)(185)ELT71TriDel

Excerpt

1. the issue involved in these stay applications are same. they being disposed off by this common order.2. consequent to a remand order of this tribunal no.c-i/1596-1620/wzb/2002, dated 30-5-2002, the issues involved in these appeals have been re-determined. vide the above said remand order it was directed that if valuation of the goods was arrived at usd 300pmt, then offer of sil was to be accepted and the goods were therefore to be released without the liability of a violation of exim policy.3. since the issues in each case have to be heard and on a prima facie conclusion it appears that the commissioner cannot raise the valuation to levels of usd 300 pmt and thereafter also hold that there was a violation of section 111(d) and then impose redemption fine and penalty, such orders are not sustainable. full waiver of pre-deposit requirement is therefore to be ordered and the recovery stayed pending the final decision in these appeals.4. considering the issues involved it is directed that these matters to be fixed for regular hearing on 7-6-2005. both sides are at liberty to mention and get other such cases listed on that date.

Full Judgment

1. The issue involved in these stay applications are same. They being disposed off by this common order.

2. Consequent to a remand order of this Tribunal No.C-I/1596-1620/WZB/2002, dated 30-5-2002, the issues involved in these appeals have been re-determined. Vide the above said remand order it was directed that if valuation of the goods was arrived at USD 300PMT, then offer of SIL was to be accepted and the goods were therefore to be released without the liability of a violation of EXIM Policy.

3. Since the issues in each case have to be heard and on a prima facie conclusion it appears that the Commissioner cannot raise the valuation to levels of USD 300 PMT and thereafter also hold that there was a violation of Section 111(d) and then impose redemption fine and penalty, such orders are not sustainable. Full waiver of pre-deposit requirement is therefore to be ordered and the recovery stayed pending the final decision in these appeals.

4. Considering the issues involved it is directed that these matters to be fixed for regular hearing on 7-6-2005. Both sides are at liberty to mention and get other such cases listed on that date.

Same Court & Year Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delh... Same Parties Royale Impex vs Commissioner of Customs Same Subject Service Tax Same Judge S T S.S., T Anjaneyulu