Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Emperor Vs. Ismail Rustomkhan

Emperor vs ismail Rustomkhan

Type Court Judgment Court Mumbai Decided Feb 14, 1906
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/331006

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Mumbai
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Appeal No. 580 of 1905
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Sections 372, 373 - Selling or buying minors for the purpose of prostitution-Minor already leading an immoral life-Protection of the sections to such minors.; The offence of selling or buying a minor for the purpose of prostitution, punishable under Sections 372 and 373 of the Indian Pe...

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Emperor

Respondent

ismail Rustomkhan

Legal References

Reported In
(1906)8BOMLR236

Excerpt

penal code (act xlv of 1860), sections 372, 373 - selling or buying minors for the purpose of prostitution-minor already leading an immoral life-protection of the sections to such minors.; the offence of selling or buying a minor for the purpose of prostitution, punishable under sections 372 and 373 of the indian penal code, is committed even where the minor, prior to such transaction, has been leading an immoral life. - lawrence jenkins, k.c.i.e., c.j.1. the first accused brought a little girl of 10 or 11 to bombay, and when she came here she undoubtedly was in his possession. it is clear that the girl passed from his possession into the possession of accused no. 2, and that accused no. 1 disposed of and accused no. 2 obtained possession of the girl in bombay.2. i further hold that the disposal and the obtaining of possession was with the intent that such minor should be employed or used for the purpose of prostitution. the learned magistrate, however, thought that the fact that this little girl had been employed as a prostitute at manmad deprived her of the protection that sections 372 and 373 afford to minors. i cannot agree with this view : it is not required by the words of the spirit of the sections.3. i am therefore of opinion that the acquittal by the magistrate is erroneous, and that both the accused should be convicted.4. the sentence that we pass on each of the accused is two years' rigorous imprisonment.russell, j.5. i am of the same opinion.

Full Judgment

Lawrence Jenkins, K.C.I.E., C.J.

1. The first accused brought a little girl of 10 or 11 to Bombay, and when she came here she undoubtedly was in his possession. It is clear that the girl passed from his possession into the possession of accused No. 2, and that accused No. 1 disposed of and accused No. 2 obtained possession of the girl in Bombay.

2. I further hold that the disposal and the obtaining of possession was with the intent that such minor should be employed or used for the purpose of prostitution. The learned Magistrate, however, thought that the fact that this little girl had been employed as a prostitute at Manmad deprived her of the protection that Sections 372 and 373 afford to minors. I cannot agree with this view : it is not required by the words of the spirit of the sections.

3. I am therefore of opinion that the acquittal by the Magistrate is erroneous, and that both the accused should be convicted.

4. The sentence that we pass on each of the accused is two years' rigorous imprisonment.

Russell, J.

5. I am of the same opinion.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial