Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ess Ess Metals Enterprises Vs. Cce

Ess Ess Metals Enterprises vs Cce

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Oct 06, 2003
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/32526

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Judge
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ess Ess Metals Enterprises

Respondent

Cce

Legal References

Reported In
(2003)(111)LC706Tri(Delhi)

Excerpt

1. m/s. ess ess metal enterprises were directed, vide stay order no.s/167/2003-nb(c) dated 15.5.2003 to deposit an amount of rs. 50 lakh within 8 weeks and the matter was to come up for reporting compliance on 29.7.2003. subsequently, the appellants moved delhi high court, which vide order dated 31.7.2003 in civil writ petition no. 4580/2003, directed them to deposit a sum of rs. 20 lakh instead of rs. 50 lakh, directed by the tribunal, on or before 30.9.2003.2. shri pradeep kumar accountant, submitted that the appellants have filed a slp before the hon'ble supreme court of india, which is pending. he, therefore, requested that the matter may be kept pending.3. shri d.n. choudhary, learned dr, on the other hand, submitted that the delhi high court has directed the appellants to deposit rs. 20 lakh on or before 30.9.2003 and as they have not deposited the same, the appeal should be rejected for non-compliance with the directions of the delhi high court particularly in absence of stay granted by the hon'ble supreme court.4. we have considered the submissions of both the sides. the hon'ble delhi high court has directed the appellants to deposit rs. 20 lakh on or before 30.9.2003. the appellants have not deposited the said amount on the date specified by the hon'ble delhi high court. they have also not brought on record any stay granted by the hon'ble supreme court.we, therefore, dismiss their appeal for non-compliance with the order passed by the delhi high court.

Full Judgment

1. M/s. Ess Ess Metal Enterprises were directed, vide Stay Order No.S/167/2003-NB(C) dated 15.5.2003 to deposit an amount of Rs. 50 lakh within 8 weeks and the matter was to come up for reporting compliance on 29.7.2003. Subsequently, the appellants moved Delhi High Court, which vide order dated 31.7.2003 in Civil Writ Petition No. 4580/2003, directed them to deposit a sum of Rs. 20 lakh instead of Rs. 50 lakh, directed by the Tribunal, on or before 30.9.2003.

2. Shri Pradeep Kumar Accountant, submitted that the appellants have filed a SLP before the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India, which is pending. He, therefore, requested that the matter may be kept pending.

3. Shri D.N. Choudhary, learned DR, on the other hand, submitted that the Delhi High Court has directed the appellants to deposit Rs. 20 lakh on or before 30.9.2003 and as they have not deposited the same, the appeal should be rejected for non-compliance with the directions of the Delhi High Court particularly in absence of Stay granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

4. We have considered the submissions of both the sides. The Hon'ble Delhi High Court has directed the appellants to deposit Rs. 20 lakh on or before 30.9.2003. The appellants have not deposited the said amount on the date specified by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court. They have also not brought on record any Stay granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.

We, therefore, dismiss their appeal for non-compliance with the order passed by the Delhi High Court.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial