M/S. Colour Graphics and Others Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, - Court Judgment |
| Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi |
| Feb-09-2001 |
| M/S. Colour Graphics and Others |
| Commissioner of Central Excise, |
1. these three appeals filed by (1) m/s. colour graphics (2) walas textiles and (3) wala brothers were dismissed for non-compliance. now a copy of the order no.277-289/94-wrb dated 29.6.94 has been placed before us in which the west zonal bench, mumbai had allowed unconditional stay in favour of these three appellants. accordingly, we recall the order of the dismissal i.e. final order no. 548-550/2000-b dated 29.2.2000. no one is present for the appellants. shri ashok kumar, in all fairness submits that this issue is already covered by larger bench of this tribunal in favour of the appellants and refers to the decision in the collector of central excise, bombay vs. auto mats india 2000 (119) elt 34 tribunal-nb. as the matter is covered in favour of the appellants although the matters are not listed for final hearing and the appellant are not present, in the interest of justice, we take up all these three appeals for disposal and after hearing the ld. dr allow all these three appeals. ordered accordingly.
1. These three appeals filed by (1) M/s. Colour Graphics (2) Walas Textiles and (3) Wala Brothers were dismissed for non-compliance. Now a copy of the order No.277-289/94-WRB dated 29.6.94 has been placed before us in which the West Zonal Bench, Mumbai had allowed unconditional stay in favour of these three appellants. Accordingly, we recall the order of the dismissal i.e. Final Order No. 548-550/2000-B dated 29.2.2000. No one is present for the appellants. Shri Ashok Kumar, in all fairness submits that this issue is already covered by Larger Bench of this Tribunal in favour of the appellants and refers to the decision in the Collector of Central Excise, Bombay vs. Auto Mats India 2000 (119) ELT 34 Tribunal-NB. As the matter is covered in favour of the appellants although the matters are not listed for final hearing and the appellant are not present, in the interest of justice, we take up all these three appeals for disposal and after hearing the ld. DR allow all these three appeals. Ordered accordingly.