Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. A.C.C. Ltd.

Commissioner of C. Ex. vs A.C.C. Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Mar 10, 2000
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/17843

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Excise

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Excise

Key legal issue
Excise

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Commissioner of C. Ex.

Respondent

A.C.C. Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(2000)(119)ELT82TriDel

Excerpt

1. the revenue filed this appeal against the order-in-appeal dated 14-5-1999 whereby the benefit of modvat credit in respect of switch gear panel, protection chain for tyre and logic controller, was allowed as capital goods under rule 57q of the central excise rules. ld. dr, appearing on behalf of the revenue, submits that these goods are not capital goods as provided under rule 57q of the central excise rules.he submits that switch gear panels is a part of generator set of 66 kv and at the relevant time, the modvat credit is admissible only on generator sets, exceeding 75 kv. in respect of protection chain for tyre, he submits that these chains are used with the dumpers which is a handling and unloading machinery and logic controller is an instrument used for controlling the operation timing for proper evacuation of material and is an electric equipment which is essential for electric power control or distribution of electricity only. he, therefore, prays that the appeal be allowed.2. ld. counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents, submits that the goods, in question, are capital goods. he submits that in the case of kanoria chemicals v c.c.e. reported in 1997 (95) e.l.t. 301 (t) and the larger bench of the tribunal in the case of jawahar mills ltd. v c.c.e. reported in 1999 (108) e.l.t. 47 held that electric switches are entitled for the benefit of modvat credit. in respect of logic controllers, he relies upon the decision of the tribunal in the case of jindal polymers v. c.c.e. reported in 1998 (103) e.l.t. 569 (t). he also relies upon the decision of the tribunal in the case of mansurpur sugar mills reported in 1996 (87) e.l.t. 91 (t) in respect of protection chain for tyre. he submits that as the goods, in question, are already held to be entitled for the benefit of modvat credit, there is no force in the appeal filed by the revenue.4. in this case, the revenue challenged the modvat credit on switch gear panels, protection chain for tyre and logic.....

Full Judgment

1. The revenue filed this appeal against the Order-in-Appeal dated 14-5-1999 whereby the benefit of Modvat credit in respect of switch gear panel, protection chain for tyre and logic controller, was allowed as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules. Ld. DR, appearing on behalf of the revenue, submits that these goods are not capital goods as provided under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules.

He submits that switch gear panels is a part of generator set of 66 KV and at the relevant time, the Modvat credit is admissible only on generator sets, exceeding 75 KV. In respect of protection chain for tyre, he submits that these chains are used with the dumpers which is a handling and unloading machinery and logic controller is an instrument used for controlling the operation timing for proper evacuation of material and is an electric equipment which is essential for electric power control or distribution of electricity only. He, therefore, prays that the appeal be allowed.

2. Ld. Counsel, appearing on behalf of the respondents, submits that the goods, in question, are capital goods. He submits that in the case of Kanoria Chemicals v C.C.E. reported in 1997 (95) E.L.T. 301 (T) and the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Jawahar Mills Ltd. v C.C.E. reported in 1999 (108) E.L.T. 47 held that electric switches are entitled for the benefit of Modvat credit. In respect of logic controllers, he relies upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Jindal Polymers v. C.C.E. reported in 1998 (103) E.L.T. 569 (T). He also relies upon the decision of the Tribunal in the case of Mansurpur Sugar Mills reported in 1996 (87) E.L.T. 91 (T) in respect of protection chain for tyre. He submits that as the goods, in question, are already held to be entitled for the benefit of Modvat credit, there is no force in the appeal filed by the revenue.

4. In this case, the revenue challenged the Modvat credit on switch gear panels, protection chain for tyre and logic controller. The Tribunal in the case of Kanoria Chemicals (supra) held that switches and panel boards are entitled for the benefit of Modvat credit as they are used as component/spare parts of plant. Therefore, the respondents are entitled for the benefit of Modvat credit in respect of switch gear panels. In respect of protection chain for tyres, the revenue is not disputing that these are used as accessories to the dumpers, which are used for transport of material from one place to another and the Tribunal in the case of Mansurpur Sugar Mills (supra), held that the material handling equipment is entitled for the benefit of Modvat credit. As these protection chains are used as accessory to the material handling equipment, these are entitled for the benefit of Modvat credit. The Tribunal in the case of Jindal Polymers (supra) held that measuring instruments, such as, process control instrument, are entitled for the benefit of Modvat credit. Logic controller is an instrument for controlling operation timing, delay or sequence of air blasters for proper evacuation. Hence, they are entitled for the benefit of Modvat credit.

5. In view of the above decisions of the Tribunal, I find no infirmity in the impugned order. The appeal filed by the revenue is rejected.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial