* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 14, 2019 CRL.M.C. 4542/2017 SUNITA & ANR. Through: Mr. Tanmay Mehta, Advocate .....Petitioners Versus BRIJENDER SINGH DESHWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Panwar, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER
(ORAL) Impugned order of 12th September, 2017 directs petitioner to place on record the income tax returns and bank statements of her brother and sister, as the case of petitioner before the trial court was that petitioner is being maintained by them. Learned counsel for petitioner relies upon Supreme Court’s decision in Manish Jain vs. Akanksha Jain AIR2017SC1640to submit that the financial position of the relatives of the wife is not required to be taken into consideration. Learned counsel respondent submits that maintenance of ₹5,200/- has been already fixed in proceedings under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as ‘DV Act’) and this fact has not been disclosed by petitioner. for CRL.M.C. 4542/2017 Page 1 of 2 Upon hearing and on perusal of the impugned order and the decision in Manish Jain (Supra), I find that respondent, once the quantum of maintenance is determined in proceedings under Section 125 of Cr.P.C then set off can be claimed. In light of Supreme Court’s decision in Manish Jain (Supra), the impugned order directing petitioner to file copy of ITRs and Bank Statements of the brother and sister cannot be sustained and is accordingly set aside. This petition is accordingly disposed of. JANUARY14 2019 v (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE CRL.M.C. 4542/2017 Page 2 of 2