Judgment:
$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order:
14. 12.2018 + FAO5632018 MRS. MADHU MANCHANDA AND ANR ..... Appellants Through: Mr. Akhil Sachar, Advocate and Ms.Sunanda Tulsyan and Ms. Aarti, Advs. versus M/S KRBL LIMITED ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate, Mr.S.K. Bansal, Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman and Mr. Avi Bhandari, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL1 Notice. Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate, accepts the notice on behalf of the respondent.
2. After making some submissions, the learned counsel for the appellants does not press the appeal but submits that directions may be issued to the Trial Court to dispose of application under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC filed by the respondent/plaintiff and their application under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC. The next date of hearing before the Trial Court is 22.01.2019. F.A.O5632018 Page 1 of 2 3. Ex-parte injunction was granted by the trial court on 02.05.2016 against the appellant on the application of the respondent under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC. The application for vacation of stay under Order 39 Rule 4 CPC was filed by the Appellant on 19.05.2016. Both these applications are still not disposed of by the Trial Court.
4. In the circumstances, the appeal is disposed of with the directions to the Trial Court to hear arguments on both the applications on the next date and decide within a period of four weeks. VINOD GOEL, J.
DECEMBER14 2018 “sandeep” F.A.O5632018 Page 2 of 2