Judgment:
* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:
08. 09.2017/11.09.2017 & 12.09.2017 Pronounced on:
27. 09.2017 LPA1732017, C.M. APPL.10119/2017, 10120/2017, 10121/2017 & 10122/2017 RANJEET SINGH GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS
..... Appellant versus And connected matters: + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + LPA3752017 LPA7902013, C.M. APPL.16742/2013 LPA6502016 LPA8962013, C.M. APPL.18674/2013 LPA732014, C.M. APPL.1542/2014 & 1543/2014 LPA742014, C.M. APPL.1544/2014 LPA5002016, C.M. APPL.33048/2016 & 19265/2017 LPA5012016 LPA5042016 LPA5052016 LPA5562016 LPA5582016 LPA5622016 LPA5752016 LPA5762016 LPA5782016 LPA5792016 LPA5802016, C.M. APPL.32818/2017 & 32819/2017 LPA5812016 LPA5822016 LPA5832016 LPA5842016 LPA5902016 LPA5912016 LPA6092016 LPA6102016 LPA6112016 LPA6122016 LPA6132016 LPA6142016 LPA6152016 LPA6172016 LPA1732017 & CONNECTED MATTERS Page 1 of 4 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + LPA6192016 LPA6292016 LPA6312016 LPA6372016 LPA6432016, C.M. APPL.42677/2016 & 42678/2016 LPA6602016 LPA6642016 LPA6862016, C.M. APPL.45491/2016 & 45492/2016 LPA642017, C.M. APPL.3156/2017, 3157/2017 & 3158/2017 LPA4462017 LPA4472017 LPA4482017 LPA4602017, C.M. APPL.23998/2017 LPA5912017 LPA812017, C.M. APPL.3762/2017 Through : Sh. Govind Kant, for Sh. Anuj Saini, Advocate, for applicant, in Item No.2. Sh. N.S. Dalal and Sh. Amit Dhankhar, Advocates, for petitioners, in Item Nos. 3, 6 and 14. Sh. Sanjay Poddar, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel, Ms. Jyoti Tyagi and Sh. Govind Kumar, Advocates, for L&B in Item Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5 to 11, 15, 17, 18, 20 to 29, 31, 32, 34, 35, 37 to 46. Sh. Biraja Mahapatra, Advocate, for L&B in Item Nos. 4, 12, 13, 16, 19, 30, 33 & 36. Sh. Arun Kumar Pathak, Advocate, for petitioners, in Item Nos. 4, 38, 40, 43, 44 to 46. Sh. B.S. Maan, Ms. Smita Maan, Sh. Vishal Maan, Sh. Paritosh Tomar, Sh. Satyawan Rathore, Sh. Naresh Maan and Sh. Aditya Singh, Advocates, for petitioners, in Item Nos. 8, 10 & 11. Sh. V.P. Rana and Sh. Yogesh Saini, Advocate, for appellant, in Item Nos. 12 & 13. Sh. Vikas Mehta and Sh. Rajat Sehgal, Advocates, for petitioners, in Item Nos. 15 to 34 and 9. Sh. Nawal Kishore Jha, Advocate, for DDA, in Item Nos.16, 18, 21 and 22. Sh. I.S. Dahiya, Advocate, for petitioner, in Item Nos. 41 & 42. Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Advocate, for DDA, in Item No.2. Sh. Arun Birbal and Sh. Sanjay Singh, Advocates, for DDA, in Item Nos. 3, 4, 26 to 30, 33, 34 and 41. Sh. Manika Tripathy Pandey and Sh. Ashutosh Kaushik, Advocates, for DDA, in Item Nos. 9, 17, 32, 44 and 46. Sh. Pawan Mathur, Advocate, for DDA, in Item No.10 Sh. Karan Sharma and Sh. Rohit, Advocates, in Item Nos. 11, 24, 31 and 39. LPA1732017 & CONNECTED MATTERS Page 2 of 4 Sh. Jitendra Kumar Tripathi with Ms. Vipul Agrawal and Sh. Anshuman Nayak, Advocate, for UOI, in Item No.14. Sh. Kush Sharma, Advocate, for DDA, in Item Nos. 15 and 20. Sh. Nawal Kishore Jha, Advocate, for DDA, in Item Nos. 16, 18, 21 and 22. Sh. M.K. Singh, Advocate, for DDA, in Item No.19. Sh. Kunal Sharma, Advocate, for DDA, in Item Nos. 25 & 26. Sh. Rajiv Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Kush Sharma, Ms. Vasudha Trivedi and Ms. Kanika Singhal, Advocates, for DDA, in Item No.31. Ms. Geeta Mehrotra, Advocate, in Item Nos. 35 to 37. Ms. Mrinalini Sen, Standing Counsel with Ms. Kritika Gupta, Advocate, for DDA, in Item Nos. 38 & 43. Sh. Sarat Chandra, Advocate, for Respondent No.4, in Item No.45. Sh. N.S. Dalal, Advocate, for petitioner, in Item No.47. Sh. Yeeshu Jain and Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocates, for respondent in Item Nos.47 & 48. Sh. Rajat Sehgal, Advocate, for petitioner, in Item No.48. Sh. Arun Birbal and Sh. Sanjay Singh, Advocates, for respondents in Item No.48. Mohd. Shahid Azad, Md. Aslam and Sh. Ashutosh Rana, Advocates, for petitioner, in Item No.49. Sh. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC with Waize Ali Noor, Advocates, in Item No.49. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % This Court finds no merit in all the appeals, except in LPA6602016. All the other appeals, i.e. LPA Nos. 73-74/2014 & 896/2013, 500-501, 504-505/2016, 556/2016, 558/2016, 562/2016, 575-576/2016 578/2016, LPA5792016, LPA5802016, LPA Nos. 581/2016, 582/2016 & 583/2016; 590/2016; 584/2016, LPA6092016; LPA6112016, LPA6122016, LPA6132016, LPA LPA1732017 & CONNECTED MATTERS Page 3 of 4 614/2016 LPA6152016; LPA6172016 & LPA6192016, LPA6292016, 631/2016, LPA6372016, LPA6432016; LPA6502016; LPA6642016 LPA6862016; LPA642017; LPA No.173/2017; LPA3752017; LPA4472017, LPA4482017; 446/2017; LPA No.81/2017; LPA7902013 and LPA5912016, LPA6102016, LPA4602017 and LPA No.591/2017 are accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. For detailed decision, the judgment dated 27.09.2017 in LPA1732017 may be referred to. S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) SUNIL GAUR (JUDGE) SEPTEMBER27 2017 LPA1732017 & CONNECTED MATTERS Page 4 of 4