Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Kerala Oil and Soaps Ltd.

Collector of Central Excise vs Kerala Oil and Soaps Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi Decided Nov 05, 1997
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/12068

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Collector of Central Excise

Respondent

Kerala Oil and Soaps Ltd.

Legal References

Reported In
(1998)(97)ELT264TriDel

Excerpt

1. respondent has sent a request for decision of the appeal on merits.we have heard shri sanjeev srivastava, jdr and perused the papers.2. respondent filed price list declaring the wholesale price and the assessable value and seeking deduction of cash discount allowed to dealers who pay price in cash or by demand draft. the assistant collector approved the price list subject to the condition that cash discount is actually availed by buyers and differential duty has to be paid in cases where buyers have not availed cash discount. in appeal, collector (appeals) set aside the order. the department being aggrieved has filed this appeal.3. department has no case that allowance of cash discount was not known to the trade or was not available to all who paid the price in cash or by demand draft. it may be that some buyers do not make such payment and do not avail the cash discount. there is no reason to hold that deduction from price should not be allowed in respect of the discount.we have held so on a consideration of several decisions of high courts and of the tribunal in the case of collector of central excise, meerut v. stallion shox ltd. - 1996 (85) e.l.t. 139. in these circumstances, the appeal has no merit and is dismissed.

Full Judgment

1. Respondent has sent a request for decision of the appeal on merits.

We have heard Shri Sanjeev Srivastava, JDR and perused the papers.

2. Respondent filed price list declaring the wholesale price and the assessable value and seeking deduction of cash discount allowed to dealers who pay price in cash or by demand draft. The Assistant Collector approved the price list subject to the condition that cash discount is actually availed by buyers and differential duty has to be paid in cases where buyers have not availed cash discount. In appeal, Collector (Appeals) set aside the order. The department being aggrieved has filed this appeal.

3. Department has no case that allowance of cash discount was not known to the trade or was not available to all who paid the price in cash or by demand draft. It may be that some buyers do not make such payment and do not avail the cash discount. There is no reason to hold that deduction from price should not be allowed in respect of the discount.

We have held so on a consideration of several decisions of High Courts and of the Tribunal in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Meerut v. Stallion Shox Ltd. - 1996 (85) E.L.T. 139. In these circumstances, the appeal has no merit and is dismissed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial