Skip to content


s.e.investments Ltd. Vs.bartronics India Limited & Anr. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Delhi High Court

Decided On

Appellant

s.e.investments Ltd.

Respondent

Bartronics India Limited & Anr.

Excerpt:


.....to the amendment by the arbitration & conciliation (amendment) act, 2015, is applicable to the present proceedings.2. learned counsel for the parties further inform that section 34 application under the arbitration & conciliation act, 1996 impugning the award/decree dated 12.07.2014 passed by the sole arbitrator is pending. ex. p.369 /2015 page 1 of 2 3. in view of the un-amended section 34, a challenge under section 34 of the act amounts to a stay of the enforcement of the award.4. in view of the above, learned counsel for the decree holder seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition in case the section 34 application impugning the award dated 12.07.2014 is decided in favour of the decree holder.5. the execution petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the decree holder, as prayed for. sanjeev sachdeva, j july05 2017 ‘sn’ ex. p.369 /2015 page 2 of 2

Judgment:


$~7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

05. 07.2017 EX.P.369 /2015 S.E.INVESTMENTS LTD. ..... Decree Holder versus BARTRONICS INDIA LIMITED & ANR. ..... Judgment Debtor Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Decree Holder For the Judgment Debtors : Mr Nagesh Puthige : Mr Sudipto Sircar and Mr A.D.N.Rao CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the parties inform that the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, as it stood prior to the amendment by the Arbitration & Conciliation (Amendment) Act, 2015, is applicable to the present proceedings.

2. Learned counsel for the parties further inform that Section 34 application under the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 impugning the award/decree dated 12.07.2014 passed by the Sole Arbitrator is pending. EX. P.369 /2015 Page 1 of 2 3. In view of the un-amended Section 34, a challenge under Section 34 of the Act amounts to a stay of the enforcement of the award.

4. In view of the above, learned counsel for the decree holder seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file a fresh petition in case the Section 34 application impugning the award dated 12.07.2014 is decided in favour of the decree holder.

5. The Execution Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the decree holder, as prayed for. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J JULY05 2017 ‘Sn’ EX. P.369 /2015 Page 2 of 2


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //