Skip to content


Union of India Vs. o.t. Anthrayose - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided On
Source Linkhttp://sci.gov.in//supremecourt/2006/21562/21562_2006_Judgement_13-Jul-2017.pdf
Case Number21562 / 2006
Judge
AppellantUnion of India
Respondento.t. Anthrayose
Advocates:D. S. Mahra
Excerpt:
in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no(s). 6056/2011 non-reportable union of india versus o.t. anthrayose appellant(s) respondent(s) judgment kurian, j.1. we are not inclined to exercise our jurisdiction to interfere with the concurrent findings rendered by the central administrative tribunal and the high court with regard to the conferment of past service including seniority from the date of joining the service of dgs & d and the consequential benefits, in the peculiar facts of this case.2. law open.3. disposed of.4. the appeal is dismissed leaving the question of pending applications, if any, shall stand there shall be no orders as to costs. new delhi; july13 2017. .......................j.[kurian joseph]. .......................j.[r. banumathi].
Judgment:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 6056/2011 NON-REPORTABLE UNION OF INDIA VERSUS O.T. ANTHRAYOSE APPELLANT(S) RESPONDENT(S)

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

1. We are not inclined to exercise our jurisdiction to interfere with the concurrent findings rendered by the Central Administrative Tribunal and the High Court with regard to the conferment of past service including seniority from the date of joining the service of DGS & D and the consequential benefits, in the peculiar facts of this case.

2. law open.

3. disposed of.

4. The appeal is dismissed leaving the question of Pending applications, if any, shall stand There shall be no orders as to costs. NEW DELHI; JULY13 2017. .......................J.

[KURIAN JOSEPH]. .......................J.

[R. BANUMATHI].


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //