Skip to content


Deoraj @ Devraj Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Supreme Court of India

Decided On

Source Link

http://sci.gov.in//supremecourt/2017/30099/30099_2017_Judgement_05-Oct-2017.pdf

Case Number

30099 / 2017

Judge

Appellant

Deoraj @ Devraj

Respondent

The State of Uttar Pradesh

Advocates:

Durga Dutt

Excerpt:


.....on bail on furnishing bail bonds to the tune of rs. 25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) each, with two solvent sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the magistrate court. new delhi; october 05, 2017. .......................j.[ kurian joseph ]. .......................j.[ r. banumathi ]. 3 item no.27 court no.4 section ii s u p r e m e c o u r t o f i n d i a record of proceedings criminal appeal no.1729 of2017[@ special leave petition (crl.) nos. 7536 of2017 deoraj @ devraj & anr. appellant(s) versus the state of uttar pradesh & anr. respondent(s) (for admission and i.r.) (exemption from filing o.t.) date :05. 10-2017 this appeal was called on for hearing today. coram : hon'ble mr. justice kurian joseph hon'ble mrs. justice r. banumathi for appellant(s) for respondent(s) upon hearing the counsel the court made the following order mr. durga dutt, aor mr. upendra narayan mishra, adv. leave granted. the appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed non-reportable judgment. pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. (jayant kumar arora) (renu diwan) court master assistant registrar (signed non-reportable judgment is placed on the file)

Judgment:


1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1729 OF2017[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NOS. 7536 OF2017 DEORAJ @ DEVRAJ @ DEVRAJ SINGH & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. In the nature of the order we propose to pass, it is not necessary to issue notice to the respondents. The appellants approached the High Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing a complaint filed in the year 2013. It appears that there are several litigations between the members of the family and the complaint of the year 2013 is one among them.

3. Be that as it may, since the Magistrate is in seisin of the matter, it will be appropriate that the appellants surrender before the Magistrate Court and cooperate with the trial. This appeal is, hence, disposed of with a direction that the appellants shall surrender before the Magistrate of competent jurisdiction and on such surrender, they will be 2 released on bail on furnishing bail bonds to the tune of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two solvent sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Magistrate Court. New Delhi; October 05, 2017. .......................J.

[ KURIAN JOSEPH ]. .......................J.

[ R. BANUMATHI ]. 3 ITEM NO.27 COURT NO.4 SECTION II S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1729 OF2017[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL.) NOS. 7536 OF2017 DEORAJ @ DEVRAJ & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R.) (EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) Date :

05. 10-2017 This appeal was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI For Appellant(s) For Respondent(s) UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

Mr. Durga Dutt, AOR Mr. Upendra Narayan Mishra, Adv. Leave granted. The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed non-reportable Judgment. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand disposed of. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR (Signed non-reportable Judgment is placed on the file)


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //