Amar Nath Neogi Vs. The State of Jharkhand - Court Judgment |
| Supreme Court of India |
| Oct-10-2017 |
| http://sci.gov.in//supremecourt/2017/22091/22091_2017_Judgement_10-Oct-2017.pdf |
| 22091 / 2017 |
| HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH, HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI |
| Amar Nath Neogi |
| The State of Jharkhand |
| Roopali Chaturvedi |
.....respondent(s) judgment kurian, j.leave granted.2. the appellant is an accused in case no.680/2015 corresponding to g.r. no.4839/2015 under sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the i.p.c. we are informed that the investigation has already been completed. we also found from the records that the appellant is a senior citizen, having crossed the age of 65 years. we are also informed that he was never in government service. we fail to understand as to why the appellant prayed for anticipatory bail in a case where final report has been filed.3. appeal as follows: in the above circumstances, we dispose of this the appellant shall surrender before the court of competent jurisdiction where the final report has been filed, within two weeks from today. on such surrender, the appellant shall be released on bail on his executing a bond to the tune of rs.50,000/- (rupees fifty thousand) with two solvent sureties to the equal amount. the appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.4. 1 pending applications, if any, shall stand 5. disposed of.6. there shall be no orders as to costs. new delhi; october10 2017. .......................j.[kurian joseph]. .......................j.[r. banumathi]. 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1758 OF2017[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRL) NOS. 7487/2017]. NON-REPORTABLE AMAR NATH NEOGI VERSUS STATE OF JHARKHAND APPELLANT(S) RESPONDENT(S)
JUDGMENT
KURIAN, J.
Leave granted.
2. The appellant is an accused in Case No.680/2015 corresponding to G.R. NO.4839/2015 under Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the I.P.C. We are informed that the investigation has already been completed. We also found from the records that the appellant is a senior citizen, having crossed the age of 65 years. We are also informed that he was never in Government service. We fail to understand as to why the appellant prayed for anticipatory bail in a case where final report has been filed.
3. appeal as follows: In the above circumstances, we dispose of this The appellant shall surrender before the Court of competent jurisdiction where the final report has been filed, within two weeks from today. On such surrender, the appellant shall be released on bail on his executing a bond to the tune of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) with two solvent sureties to the equal amount. The appeal is, accordingly, disposed of.
4. 1 Pending applications, if any, shall stand 5. disposed of.
6. There shall be no orders as to costs. NEW DELHI; OCTOBER10 2017. .......................J.
[KURIAN JOSEPH]. .......................J.
[R. BANUMATHI]. 2