Skip to content


B. Namachivayabarathi Vs. S. Murugan and Others - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtChennai Madurai High Court
Decided On
Case NumberContempt Petition (MD) No. 234 of 2016 in Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 8687 of 2015
Judge
AppellantB. Namachivayabarathi
RespondentS. Murugan and Others
Excerpt:
contempt of the courts act, 1971 - section 11 - disobedience - petitioner sought to punish respondents for wilful disobedience of orders of this honourable court made in criminal petition - court held - on complaint given by petitioner, petitioner enquiry was conducted and same was subsequently closed on prescribed date - copy of closure report has been furnished to petitioner across bar - contempt petition dismissed. paras 2, 3 .....under section 11 of the contempt of the courts act, 1971 praying to punish the respondents for the wilful disobedience of the orders of this honourable court made in crl.o.p.(md).no.8687 of 2015 dated 05.08.2015.) 1. this contempt petition has been filed for punishing the respondents for the wilful disobedience of the orders of this court made in crl.o.p.(md).no.8687 of 2015 dated 05.08.2015. 2. when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned government advocate (crl.side) would submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner, petitioner enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 15.10.2015. a copy of the closure report has been furnished to learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. 3. in view of the above submission, this contempt petition is.....
Judgment:

(Prayer: This contempt petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of the Courts Act, 1971 praying to punish the respondents for the wilful disobedience of the orders of this Honourable Court made in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8687 of 2015 dated 05.08.2015.)

1. This contempt petition has been filed for punishing the respondents for the wilful disobedience of the orders of this Court made in Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8687 of 2015 dated 05.08.2015.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner, petitioner enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 15.10.2015. A copy of the closure report has been furnished to learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar.

3. In view of the above submission, this Contempt Petition is dismissed. No costs.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //