M. Shankar Vs. The District Collector,Collectorate Campus, Ramanathapuram and Others - Court Judgment |
| Chennai Madurai High Court |
| Jun-15-2016 |
| W.P.(MD)No. 609 of 2016 & W.M.P(MD)No. 493 of 2016 |
| M. Venugopal |
| M. Shankar |
| The District Collector,Collectorate Campus, Ramanathapuram and Others |
(prayer: writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, to issue a writ of mandamus forbearing the respondents 3 and 4 from in any way executing the construction work for ''sukathara valagam'' in 1. kattuparamakudi, 2.emaneshwaram northern side of vaigai river, 3.floor bridge, 4.service road, and 5.emaneshwaram under clean india scheme 2015-2016, without following the procedures of tender transparency act.) 1. the learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement in the typed-set of papers of the writ petition to the effect that the writ petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. 2. recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is dismissed. no costs.
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents 3 and 4 from in any way executing the construction work for ''Sukathara Valagam'' in 1. Kattuparamakudi, 2.Emaneshwaram Northern side of Vaigai River, 3.Floor Bridge, 4.Service Road, and 5.Emaneshwaram under Clean India Scheme 2015-2016, without following the procedures of Tender Transparency Act.)
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner has made an endorsement in the typed-set of papers of the Writ Petition to the effect that the writ petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition.
2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. No costs.