Skip to content


The General Manager, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Thiruchirappalli Vs. Shanmugavel and Another - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtChennai Madurai High Court
Decided On
Case NumberC.M.A (MD) No. 1678 of 2013 & M.P (MD). No. 3 of 2013
Judge
AppellantThe General Manager, The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., Thiruchirappalli
RespondentShanmugavel and Another
Excerpt:
.....claimant sustained grievous injuries in road accident claimant sought compensation before tribunal tribunal awarded prescribed amount as compensation appellant/ insurance company aggrieved over said award contended that there are in-consistencies both in medical report as well as deposition of doctor before tribunal hence this civil miscellaneous appeal - court held evidence of doctor need not be considered by this court first respondent sustained grievous injuries more specifically in his right hand and also in right side of rib -even after medical treatment as inpatient first respondent is suffering from breathing trouble and partial permanent disability was assessed at prescribed percentage first respondent is not able to perform his work -such being nature of..........and decree passed in m.c.o.p.no.450 of 2006, dated 27.09.2012, on the file of the motor accident claims tribunal cum chief judicial magistrate, thiruchirappalli.) 1. it is a case of an injury caused on account of an accident took place on 04.07.2005 around 9.30 p.m. near trichy-thanjavur main road. the injured victim sustained grievous injuries and he filed an application seeking compensation before the tribunal, trichy and the tribunal by considering the facts and circumstances, awarded a sum of rs.84,000/- as total compensation. 2. challenging the same, the appellant preferred the present appeal on the ground that there are in-consistencies both in the medical report as well as the deposition of the doctor, who examined before the tribunal. 3. heard the learned counsels on both side.....
Judgment:

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree passed in M.C.O.P.No.450 of 2006, dated 27.09.2012, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thiruchirappalli.)

1. It is a case of an injury caused on account of an accident took place on 04.07.2005 around 9.30 p.m. near Trichy-Thanjavur main road. The injured victim sustained grievous injuries and he filed an application seeking compensation before the Tribunal, Trichy and the Tribunal by considering the facts and circumstances, awarded a sum of Rs.84,000/- as total compensation.

2. Challenging the same, the appellant preferred the present appeal on the ground that there are in-consistencies both in the medical report as well as the deposition of the doctor, who examined before the Tribunal.

3. Heard the learned counsels on both side and the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent and perused the materials available on record.

4. The learned counsel for the 1st respondent/claimant opposed the grounds of appeal by stating that though there are some discrepancies of the doctor's evidence, there was possibilities of the doctor, who gave evidence would not have treated the patient and hence this appeal deserves dismissal.

5. In the facts and circumstances, the evidence of the doctor need not be considered by this Court. The Tribunal has awarded a sum of Rs.84,000/- as total compensation. Further, the injured sustained serious grievous injuries more specifically in his right hand and also in the right side of the rib. He took treatment as inpatient and not able to perform his work. To prove his disability, Ex.P.10, issued by PW4, was marked as one of the documents. Even after the medical treatment the respondent/claimant is suffering from breathing trouble and the partial permanent disability was assessed as 32%. Such being the nature of the injuries, the total compensation of a sum of Rs.84,000/- granted by the Tribunal is a just compensation, which required no reconsideration or reduction. Consequently, this Court is not inclined to appreciate the ground of appeal, filed by the appellant and accordingly the award passed in M.C.O.P.450 of 2006, dated 27.09.2012, by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchirappalli, is confirmed.

6. In the result, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

7. The appellant is directed to deposit the entire award amount with accrued interest and costs,to the credit of M.C.O.P.No.450 of 2006, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruchirappalli, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, ifnot already deposited. On such deposit being made, the 1st respondent/claimant is permitted to withdraw the entire award amount with accrued interest and costs, through RTGS by filing necessary applications before the Tribunal concerned.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //