Skip to content


Union of India Vs. P N Arora and anr. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtDelhi High Court
Decided On
Judge
AppellantUnion of India
RespondentP N Arora and anr.
Excerpt:
* in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision:12. h november, 2014 + la.app. 74/2014 union of india through: ..... appellant ms. jyoti tyagi, advocate for mr.yeeshu jain, advocate versus p n arora & anr. through: ..... respondent mr. d.p. kaushik, advocate for respondent no.2-dda coram: hon'ble mr. justice sunil gaur judgment (oral) impugned judgment grants compensation for ‘a’ category of land @ `16,74,500/- per acre with consequential benefits to respondent in respect of his land situated in village holambi kalan, delhi, which was acquired vide notification of 22nd august, 2001, under section 4 of the land acquisition act, 1894. learned counsel for appellant fairly concedes that costs imposed vide order of 17th february, 2014 have not yet been paid and undertakes on.....
Judgment:

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:

12. h November, 2014 + LA.APP. 74/2014 UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Appellant Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate for Mr.Yeeshu Jain, Advocate versus P N ARORA & ANR. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. D.P. Kaushik, Advocate for respondent No.2-DDA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR JUDGMENT

(Oral) Impugned judgment grants compensation for ‘A’ category of land @ `16,74,500/- per acre with consequential benefits to respondent in respect of his land situated in village Holambi Kalan, Delhi, which was acquired vide Notification of 22nd August, 2001, under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Learned counsel for appellant fairly concedes that costs imposed vide order of 17th February, 2014 have not yet been paid and undertakes on behalf of appellant that cost of `500/- would be deposited with the Advocates Welfare Fund within six weeks. Let it be so done. Upon hearing and on perusal of the impugned judgment which relies upon a decision of a Coordinate bench of this Court in LA.APP No.LA.APP No.74/2014 Page 1 266/2008, ‘Jai Singh Vs. UOI & anr.’, rendered on 23rd August, 2011, this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the impugned order. As a result thereof, this appeal is dismissed, with no order as to costs. (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE NOVEMBER12 2014 r LA.APP No.74/2014 Page 2


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //