Judgment:
CWP No.13231 of 2014 [1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13231 of 2014(O&M) Date of Decision: July 11, 2014.
Neelam .....PETITIONER (s) Versus State of Haryana and others .....RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE LISA GILL Present: Mr.Sanjay Mittal, Advocate for the petitioner.
***** 1.
Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?.
2.
To be referred to the reports or not?.
3.
Whether the judgment should be reported in the digest?.
***** SURYA KANT, J.(Oral) The petitioner's case is that her land measuring 7 Marla fully described in para No.2 of the writ petition was acquired by the State of Haryana vide award dated 25.03.1992.
The petitioner on that basis claims to be an oustee, who is entitled for allotment of a plot under the “Oustee's policy”.
framed by the respondents from time to time.
Since the petitioner's claim has not been decided so far, she has approached this Court.
Singh Omkar It is claimed by the petitioner that she is entitled for allotment of a 2014.08.01 14:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CWP No.13231 of 2014 [2].plot in Sector 3 Part, Rewari under the abovesaid Oustee's policy.
Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner, considering the nature of the relief sought in this petition and however, without expressing any views on merit of the case, we dispose of this petition with a direction to the respondents to verify the petitioner's claim and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law/policy decision within a period of two months from the date of receiving a certified copy of this order.
Ordered accordingly.
( SURYA KANT ) JUDGE ( LISA GILL ) July 11, 2014.
JUDGE ‘om’ Singh Omkar 2014.08.01 14:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh