Judgment:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.13908 of 2014 Date of Decision: 21.7.2014 Paramjit Kaur .....Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK Present : Ms.Natasha, Advocate for Mr M.K.Dogra, Advocate for the petitioner.
**** RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK J.
(ORAL) Feeling aggrieved against the alleged inaction on the part of respondent authorities, petitioner has approached this Court, by way of instant writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ in the nature of Mandamus.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that when the grievance of the petitioner was not being redressed by the respondent authorities, she finally approached respondent No.2 by way of representation dated 30.8.2013 (Annexure P-8).but the same is also pending decision.
He further submits that the petitioner will be satisfied in case respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide her representation, within a reasonable time.
Kumar Amit 2014.07.22 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Civil Writ Petition No.13908 of 2014 2 Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, including the issue of limitation, if any, the Director Public Instructions (EE).respondent No.2 is directed to look into the matter, consider the grievance of the petitioner, raised vide her representation dated 30.8.2013 (Annexure P-8) and decide the same, at an early date by passing an appropriate order thereon, in accordance with law, but in any case within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
With the observations made above, the present petition stands disposed of.
(RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK) JUDGE217.2014 Ak Sharma Kumar Amit 2014.07.22 10:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document