Skip to content


Present: Mr. L.M. Gulati Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Another - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Present: Mr. L.M. Gulati Advocate

Respondent

State of Punjab and Another

Excerpt:


.....dag, punjab. **** anita chaudhry, j(oral) the instant petition is for quashing of fir no.240 dated 07.10.2008 registered under sections 323/324/294/506/148/149 ipc, police station islamabad, district amritsar and the consequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of written compromise arrived at between the parties. report has been received from the trial court after statements of the parties was recorded regarding the compromise. the trial court has reported that the compromise is voluntary and without any pressure or coercion. the trial court has also sent copy of the statements of parties. sunil 2014.07.17 16:26 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document crl. misc. no.m-37366 of 2013 2 learned counsel for the state on instructions submits that petitioners are the only accused and respondent no.2 is the only aggrieved person in this fir. no useful purpose would be served to keep the fir pending. in view of the statements and report of the trial court and the principles laid down by the full bench judgment of this court in kulwinder singh and others versus state of punjab and another, 2007(3) rcr (criminal) 1052, approved by.....

Judgment:


Crl.

Misc.

No.M-37366 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl.

Misc.

No.M-37366 of 2013 Date of decision : 17.07.2014 Manna Kumar and others ......Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab and another ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE ANITA CHAUDHRY Present: Mr.L.M.Gulati, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Mr.V.K.Chaudhary, DAG, Punjab.

**** ANITA CHAUDHRY, J(ORAL) The instant petition is for quashing of FIR No.240 dated 07.10.2008 registered under Sections 323/324/294/506/148/149 IPC, Police Station Islamabad, District Amritsar and the consequent proceedings arising out of the same, on the basis of written compromise arrived at between the parties.

Report has been received from the trial Court after statements of the parties was recorded regarding the compromise.

The trial Court has reported that the compromise is voluntary and without any pressure or coercion.

The trial Court has also sent copy of the statements of parties.

Sunil 2014.07.17 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Crl.

Misc.

No.M-37366 of 2013 2 Learned counsel for the State on instructions submits that petitioners are the only accused and respondent no.2 is the only aggrieved person in this FIR.

No useful purpose would be served to keep the FIR pending.

In view of the statements and report of the trial Court and the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others versus State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, approved by Hon'ble Apex Court in Gian Singh versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC303 the instant petition is allowed and the aforesaid FIR and all consequent proceedings conducted on the basis thereof are quashed.

Needless to say that parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements made in the Court below.

17.07.2014 (ANITA CHAUDHRY) sunil JUDGE Sunil 2014.07.17 16:26 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //