Skip to content


Present : Mr. Rajeev Anand Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Punjab and Haryana High Court

Decided On

Appellant

Present : Mr. Rajeev Anand Advocate

Respondent

State of Punjab and Others

Excerpt:


.....the petitioners for a period of four weeks so as to enable them to appear before the investigating officer on 21.7.2014 in case fir/cr no.5/14 under sections 498-a, 385, 386, 387, 506 (ii) read with sections 511 and 34 ipc registered at women police station, panaji-goa on the complaint submitted by smt.brenda manrao, wife of naveen manrao, who is son of petitioners anil manrao and smt. anita rani. notice of motion. on the asking of the court, mr.gurinderjit singh, deputy a.g., punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.1 crm m-23331 of 2014 -2- while mr.j.s.toor, additional public prosecutor for ut, chandigarh for respondent no.3. it is the case of the petitioners that they are permanent residents of chandigarh. however, smt. brenda manrao, who is married to the son of anil manrao and smt.anita rani-petitioners.in connivance with her husband, has lodged the aforementioned fir/cr against them at women police station, panaji-goa. in the said fir/cr, all the petitioners have been summoned for 21.7.2014. copies of the notices issued to the petitioners have been appended with the petition as annexure p-5 (colly.) it is submitted that because of paucity of time, the petitioners.....

Judgment:


IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM M-23331 of 2014 Date of Decision : July 16, 2014 Anil Manrao and others .....Petitioners VERSUS State of Punjab and others .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE T.P.S.MANN Present : Mr.Rajeev Anand, Advocate for the petitioners T.P.S.MANN, J.

(Oral) Prayer made in the present petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is for the grant of transit/interim bail to the petitioners for a period of four weeks so as to enable them to appear before the Investigating Officer on 21.7.2014 in case FIR/CR No.5/14 under Sections 498-A, 385, 386, 387, 506 (ii) read with Sections 511 and 34 IPC registered at Women Police Station, Panaji-Goa on the complaint submitted by Smt.Brenda Manrao, wife of Naveen Manrao, who is son of petitioners Anil Manrao and Smt.

Anita Rani.

Notice of motion.

On the asking of the Court, Mr.Gurinderjit Singh, Deputy A.G., Punjab accepts notice on behalf of respondent No.1 CRM M-23331 of 2014 -2- while Mr.J.S.Toor, Additional Public Prosecutor for UT, Chandigarh for respondent No.3.

It is the case of the petitioners that they are permanent residents of Chandigarh.

However, Smt.

Brenda Manrao, who is married to the son of Anil Manrao and Smt.Anita Rani-petitioneRs.in connivance with her husband, has lodged the aforementioned FIR/CR against them at Women Police Station, Panaji-Goa.

In the said FIR/CR, all the petitioners have been summoned for 21.7.2014.

Copies of the notices issued to the petitioners have been appended with the petition as Annexure P-5 (Colly.) It is submitted that because of paucity of time, the petitioners are not in a position to approach the Court of competent jurisdiction of Panaji-Goa for the grant of anticipatory bail.

They apprehend their arrest while proceeding for appearing before the Investigating Officer at Panaji-Goa.

Prayer has, accordingly, been made for the grant of transit/interim bail to the petitioneRs.Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on going through the petition, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioners deserve protection against arrest but for a limited period of time so that they may appear before the Investigating Officer at Women Police Station, Panaji-Goa.

CRM M-23331 of 2014 -3- Resultantly, it is directed that the petitioners be not arrested either by the Punjab Police or by the UT, Chandigarh Police or even by the Goa police upto 25.7.2014.

However, they shall present themselves before the Investigating Officer at Women Police Station, Panaji-Goa on 21.7.2014 and join the investigation.

The petitioners shall, however, be at liberty to approach the concerned Court at Panaji-Goa for the grant of concession of anticipatory bail.

The petition is, accordingly, disposed of.

( T.P.S.MANN ) July 16, 2014 JUDGE ajay-1 Kumar-I Ajay 2014.07.16 12:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //