Skip to content


Present: Ms. Payal JaIn Advocate with Vs. State of Punjab and Others - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtPunjab and Haryana High Court
Decided On
AppellantPresent: Ms. Payal JaIn Advocate with
RespondentState of Punjab and Others
Excerpt:
.....to respondent no.3 by today itself during the cours.of the day. a copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of court secretary attached to this court. (ritu bahri) judge1507.2014 g arora arora gaurav 2014.07.15 15:37 i attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
Judgment:

CWP No.6340 of 2014 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.6340 of 2014 (O&M) Date of decision : 15.07.2014 Shri Anish Poddar ...Petitioner versus State of Punjab and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE RITU BAHRI Present: Ms.Payal Jain, Advocate with Mr.Kulbhushan Sharma, Advocate and Ms.Mansi Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.Rupam Aggarwal, DAG, Punjab Ms.Vinita Bansal, Advocate for respondent No.3.

**** RITU BAHRI , J.

(Oral) The present writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India is for issuance of writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned orders dated 15.11.2013 and 13.02.2013 in File No.6/SDM in the matter of Gopal Prasad Poddar versus Anish Poddar passed by learned SDM, Patiala in the capacity of Maintenance Tribunal under the Maintenance and welfare of Parents and Senior Citizen Act, 2007 Learned counsel for respondent No.3 has put in appearance and submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties.

The original settlement deed along with true translated copy (Hindi to English) has been filed in the Court today and the same is taken on record.

As per this settlement deed, both the parties are not willing to continue all the cases pending between them.

They have entered in to this settlement on 12.07.2014 Arora Gaurav 2014.07.15 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.6340 of 2014 -2- with their own sweet will.

Petitioner will pay Rs.2000/- per month to respondent No.3 every month.

Further petitioner shall not be liable now for any kind of social responsibility towards respondent No.3.

Petitioner shall not have any other previous and future liability towards respondent No.3.

Respondent No.3 shall also not be eligible to claim any money from the petitioner in terms of the order of the SDM Patiala, the appeal against which is pending before the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

The litigation expenses amounting to Rs.15,000/- deposited by the petitioner, shall be released to respondent No.3.

Now no dispute is pending between the parties and both the parties shall withdraw the pending proceedings and respondent No.3 shall not file any further case on the petitioner.

The settlement deed is taken on record as Annexure A-1.

In view of the above, orders dated 15.11.2013 and 13.02.2013 in File No.6/SDM are hereby set aside The petition is disposed of.

However, Registry is directed to release Rs.15,000/- deposited by the petitioner to respondent No.3 by today itself during the couRs.of the day.

A copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of Court Secretary attached to this Court.

(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE1507.2014 G Arora Arora Gaurav 2014.07.15 15:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //